Suppr超能文献

母乳喂养时长与接生人员类型之间的关联

Association between Breastfeeding Duration and Type of Birth Attendant.

作者信息

Wallenborn Jordyn T, Masho Saba W

机构信息

School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main Street, Suite 821, P.O. Box 980212, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Pregnancy. 2018 Mar 1;2018:7198513. doi: 10.1155/2018/7198513. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare providers play an integral role in breastfeeding education and subsequent practices; however, the education and support provided to patients may differ by type of provider. The current study aims to evaluate the association between type of birth attendant and breastfeeding duration.

METHODS

Data from the prospective longitudinal study, Infant Feeding Practices Survey II, was analyzed. Breastfeeding duration and exclusive breastfeeding duration were defined using the American Academy of Pediatrics' national recommendations. Type of birth attendant was categorized into obstetricians, other physicians, and midwife or nurse midwife. If mothers received prenatal care from a different type of provider than the birth attendant, they were excluded from the analysis. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Compared to mothers whose births were attended by an obstetrician, mothers with a family doctor or midwife were twice as likely to breastfeed at least six months. Similarly, mothers with a midwife birth attendant were three times as likely to exclusively breastfeed less than six months and six times more likely to exclusively breastfeed at least six months compared to those who had an obstetrician birth attendant.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the current study highlight the importance of birth attendants in breastfeeding decisions. Interventions are needed to overcome barriers physicians encounter while providing breastfeeding support and education. However, this study is limited by several confounding factors that have not been controlled for as well as by the self-selection of the population.

摘要

引言

医疗服务提供者在母乳喂养教育及后续实践中发挥着不可或缺的作用;然而,向患者提供的教育和支持可能因提供者类型而异。本研究旨在评估接生人员类型与母乳喂养持续时间之间的关联。

方法

对前瞻性纵向研究“婴儿喂养实践调查II”的数据进行了分析。母乳喂养持续时间和纯母乳喂养持续时间依据美国儿科学会的国家建议进行定义。接生人员类型分为产科医生、其他医生以及助产士或注册助产士。如果母亲接受产前护理的提供者与接生人员类型不同,则将其排除在分析之外。进行了多项逻辑回归分析以获得粗略和调整后的比值比及95%置信区间。

结果

与由产科医生接生的母亲相比,由家庭医生或助产士接生的母亲进行至少六个月母乳喂养的可能性高出两倍。同样,与由产科医生接生的母亲相比,有助产士接生的母亲进行少于六个月纯母乳喂养的可能性高出三倍,进行至少六个月纯母乳喂养的可能性高出六倍。

结论

本研究结果凸显了接生人员在母乳喂养决策中的重要性。需要采取干预措施来克服医生在提供母乳喂养支持和教育时遇到的障碍。然而,本研究受到几个未得到控制的混杂因素以及人群自我选择的限制。

相似文献

1
Association between Breastfeeding Duration and Type of Birth Attendant.
J Pregnancy. 2018 Mar 1;2018:7198513. doi: 10.1155/2018/7198513. eCollection 2018.
2
The Impact of the Professional Qualifications of the Prenatal Care Provider on Breastfeeding Duration.
Breastfeed Med. 2018 Mar;13(2):106-111. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0133. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Association Between Healthcare Provider Type and Intent to Breastfeed Among Expectant Mothers.
Matern Child Health J. 2016 May;20(5):993-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1884-x.
4
Opinions and practices of clinicians associated with continuation of exclusive breastfeeding.
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):e283-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.e283.
6
Knowledge of Breastfeeding Recommendations and Breastfeeding Duration: A Survival Analysis on Infant Feeding Practices II.
Breastfeed Med. 2017 Apr;12:156-162. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0170. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Exclusive breastfeeding after home versus hospital birth in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 13;15:262. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0688-8.
8
Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13027. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jul;19(7):1608-15. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1671-8.
2
Trends in midwife-attended births in the United States, 1989-2009.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(4):321-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00198.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
3
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
4
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):377-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
5
Pediatricians and the promotion and support of breastfeeding.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Dec;162(12):1142-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.12.1142.
6
How do physicians and midwives manage the third stage of labor?
Birth. 2008 Sep;35(3):220-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00243.x.
7
Why mothers stop breastfeeding: mothers' self-reported reasons for stopping during the first year.
Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122 Suppl 2:S69-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1315i.
8
Infant Feeding Practices Study II: study methods.
Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122 Suppl 2:S28-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1315c.
9
The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice.
Nutr Rev. 2005 Apr;63(4):103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00128.x.
10
First time mothers' views of breastfeeding support from nurses.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200301000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验