Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Research, Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Building for Transformative Medicine, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Biomedical Center (BMC), Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jul;136(1):19-40. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1846-7. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
Significant data suggest that soluble Aβ oligomers play an important role in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but there is great confusion over what exactly constitutes an Aβ oligomer and which oligomers are toxic. Most studies have utilized synthetic Aβ peptides, but the relevance of these test tube experiments to the conditions that prevail in AD is uncertain. A few groups have studied Aβ extracted from human brain, but they employed vigorous tissue homogenization which is likely to release insoluble Aβ that was sequestered in plaques during life. Several studies have found such extracts to possess disease-relevant activity and considerable efforts are being made to purify and better understand the forms of Aβ therein. Here, we compared the abundance of Aβ in AD extracts prepared by traditional homogenization versus using a far gentler extraction, and assessed their bioactivity via real-time imaging of iPSC-derived human neurons plus the sensitive functional assay of long-term potentiation. Surprisingly, the amount of Aβ retrieved by gentle extraction constituted only a small portion of that released by traditional homogenization, but this readily diffusible fraction retained all of the Aβ-dependent neurotoxic activity. Thus, the bulk of Aβ extractable from AD brain was innocuous, and only the small portion that was aqueously diffusible caused toxicity. This unexpected finding predicts that generic anti-oligomer therapies, including Aβ antibodies now in trials, may be bound up by the large pool of inactive oligomers, whereas agents that specifically target the small pool of diffusible, bioactive Aβ would be more useful. Furthermore, our results indicate that efforts to purify and target toxic Aβ must employ assays of disease-relevant activity. The approaches described here should enable these efforts, and may assist the study of other disease-associated aggregation-prone proteins.
大量数据表明,可溶性 Aβ 寡聚物在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中发挥着重要作用,但对于什么是 Aβ 寡聚物以及哪些寡聚物具有毒性存在很大的混淆。大多数研究都利用了合成的 Aβ 肽,但这些试管实验与 AD 中普遍存在的情况的相关性尚不确定。有几个小组研究了从人脑提取的 Aβ,但他们采用了剧烈的组织匀浆,这可能会释放出在生命过程中被斑块隔离的不可溶性 Aβ。几项研究发现,这些提取物具有与疾病相关的活性,并且正在努力对其进行纯化和更好地理解其中的 Aβ 形式。在这里,我们比较了通过传统匀浆法和更温和的提取方法制备的 AD 提取物中 Aβ 的丰度,并通过实时成像检测诱导多能干细胞衍生的人类神经元和长期增强的敏感功能测定来评估它们的生物活性。令人惊讶的是,温和提取法回收的 Aβ量仅占传统匀浆法释放量的一小部分,但这种易于扩散的部分保留了所有依赖 Aβ 的神经毒性活性。因此,从 AD 大脑中提取的 Aβ 的大部分是无害的,只有一小部分可在水中扩散的 Aβ 会引起毒性。这一意外发现预测,通用的抗寡聚物疗法,包括目前正在临床试验中的 Aβ 抗体,可能会受到大量无活性寡聚物的限制,而专门针对可扩散、具有生物活性的小部分 Aβ 的药物会更有用。此外,我们的研究结果表明,纯化和靶向有毒 Aβ 的努力必须采用与疾病相关的活性测定方法。这里描述的方法应该能够实现这些努力,并可能有助于研究其他与疾病相关的易于聚集的蛋白质。