School of Medicine and Public Health.
Division of Rheumatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;24(4):210-217. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000726.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Given heightened cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and that higher blood pressure (BP) represents greater CVD risk, we hypothesized that higher BP would predict more BP-related communication in rheumatology visits. We examined predictors of documented BP communication during RA clinic visits.
This was a retrospective cohort study of RA patients identified in electronic health record records with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) receiving both primary and rheumatology care. Trained abstractors reviewed RA visit notes for "BP communication" using a standardized tool to elicit documentation about BP or HTN beyond recording vital signs. We used multivariate logistic regression to examine the impact of BP category (American Heart Association: ideal normotension, pre-HTN, and stages I and II HTN) on odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of BP communication.
Among 1267 RA patients, 40% experienced BP elevations meeting the definition of uncontrolled HTN. Of 2677 eligible RA visits, 22% contained any documented BP communication. After adjustment, models predicted only 31% of visits with markedly high BPs 160/100 mm Hg or greater would contain BP communication. Compared with stage I, stage II elevation did not significantly increase communication (odds ratio, 2.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.8] vs. 1.5 [1.2-2.2]), although both groups' odds exceeded pre-HTN and normotension. Less than 10% of eligible visits resulted in documented action steps recommending follow-up of high BP.
Regardless of BP magnitude, most RA clinic visits lacked documented communication about BP despite compounded CVD risk. Future work should study how rheumatology clinics can facilitate follow-up of high BPs to address HTN as the most common and reversible CVD risk factor.
背景/目的:鉴于类风湿关节炎(RA)患者心血管疾病(CVD)风险增加,且更高的血压(BP)代表更高的 CVD 风险,我们假设更高的 BP 会预测 RA 就诊时更多与 BP 相关的沟通。我们研究了 RA 诊所就诊时记录的 BP 沟通的预测因素。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为电子健康记录中患有未控制高血压(HTN)的 RA 患者,这些患者同时接受初级保健和风湿病学治疗。经过培训的摘要员使用标准化工具查看 RA 就诊记录中的“BP 沟通”,以记录除生命体征外的 BP 或 HTN 相关信息。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来检查 BP 类别(美国心脏协会:理想的正常血压、前期高血压和 I 期和 II 期高血压)对 BP 沟通的比值比(95%置信区间)的影响。
在 1267 名 RA 患者中,有 40%的患者的 BP 升高符合未控制 HTN 的定义。在 2677 次合格的 RA 就诊中,有 22%的就诊记录中包含任何有记录的 BP 沟通。调整后,模型仅预测 31%的血压显著升高(BP≥160/100mmHg)的就诊记录中包含 BP 沟通。与 I 期相比,II 期升高并没有显著增加沟通(比值比,2.0 [95%置信区间,1.4-2.8] vs. 1.5 [1.2-2.2]),尽管这两个组的比值都超过了前期高血压和正常血压。只有不到 10%的合格就诊记录中记录了建议对高血压进行随访的行动步骤。
尽管 CVD 风险增加,但大多数 RA 诊所就诊时都缺乏关于 BP 的记录沟通,无论 BP 幅度如何。未来的研究应研究风湿病学诊所如何促进对高血压的随访,以解决高血压作为最常见和可逆转的 CVD 风险因素。