Suppr超能文献

冲动性攻击和注意缺陷多动障碍及破坏性行为障碍中的反应抑制:系统评价研究结果。

Impulsive aggression and response inhibition in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and disruptive behavioral disorders: Findings from a systematic review.

机构信息

Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jul;90:231-246. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although impulsive aggression (IA) and dysfunctional response inhibition (RI) are hallmarks of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and disrupted behavioral disorders (DBDs), little is known about their shared and distinct deviant neural mechanisms.

AIMS AND METHODS

Here, we selectively reviewed s/fMRI ADHD and DBD studies to identify disorder-specific and shared IA and RI aberrant neural mechanisms.

RESULTS

In ADHD, deviant prefrontal and cingulate functional activity was associated with increased IA. Structural alterations were most pronounced in the cingulate cortex. Subjects with DBDs showed marked cortico-subcortical dysfunctions. ADHD and DBDs share similar cortico-limbic structural and functional alterations. RI deficits in ADHD highlighted hypoactivity in the dorso/ventro-lateral PFC, insula, and striatum, while the paralimbic system was primarily dysfunctional in DBDs. Across disorders, extensively altered cortico-limbic dysfunctions underlie IA, while RI was mostly associated with aberrant prefrontal activity.

CONCLUSION

Control network deficits were evidenced across clinical phenotypes in IA and RI. Dysfunctions at any level within these cortico-subcortical projections lead to deficient cognitive-affective control by ascribing emotional salience to otherwise irrelevant stimuli. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

背景

冲动性攻击(IA)和功能失调的反应抑制(RI)是注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和行为障碍(DBD)的标志,但对于它们共同和独特的异常神经机制知之甚少。

目的和方法

在这里,我们选择性地回顾了 s/fMRI ADHD 和 DBD 研究,以确定特定于疾病和共享的 IA 和 RI 异常神经机制。

结果

在 ADHD 中,前额叶和扣带回的功能活动异常与 IA 的增加有关。结构改变在扣带回皮质最为明显。DBD 患者表现出明显的皮质下功能障碍。ADHD 和 DBD 共享类似的皮质边缘结构和功能改变。ADHD 中的 RI 缺陷突出了背/腹外侧前额叶皮层、岛叶和纹状体的活动不足,而边缘系统在 DBD 中主要功能失调。在各种疾病中,广泛改变的皮质边缘功能障碍是 IA 的基础,而 RI 主要与异常的前额叶活动有关。

结论

IA 和 RI 在临床表型中都有证据表明控制网络缺陷。这些皮质下投射中任何水平的功能障碍都会导致认知情感控制不足,因为将情绪显著性归因于无关刺激。讨论了这些发现的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验