Suppr超能文献

探索放疗靶区定位策略和剂量:III 期 NSCLC 联合治疗协作组试验的汇总分析。

Exploring Radiotherapy Targeting Strategy and Dose: A Pooled Analysis of Cooperative Group Trials of Combined Modality Therapy for Stage III NSCLC.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; School of Public Health, HKU Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Aug;13(8):1171-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard therapy for locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) patients. This study was performed to examine thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) parameters and their impact on patient survival.

METHODS

We collected individual patient data from 3600 LA-NSCLC patients participating in 16 cooperative group trials of concurrent CRT. The primary TRT parameters examined included field design strategy (elective nodal irradiation [ENI] compared to involved-field TRT (IF-TRT)), total dose, and biologically effective dose (BED). Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival were calculated with univariable and multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

TRT doses ranged from 60 Gy to 74 Gy with most treatments administered once-daily. ENI was associated with poorer survival than IF-TRT (univariable HR = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.51, p < 0.0001; multivariable HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.08-1.59, p = 0.002). The median survival times of the IF and ENI patients were 24 months and 16 months, respectively. Patients were divided into three dose groups: low total dose (60 Gy), medium total dose (>60 Gy to 66 Gy), and high total dose (>66 Gy to 74 Gy). With reference to the low-dose group, the multivariable HRs were 1.08 for the medium-dose group (95% CI: 0.93-1.25) and 1.12 for the high-dose group (95% CI: 0.97-1.30).The univariate p = 0.054 and multivariable p = 0.17. BED was grouped as follows: low (<55.5 Gy), medium (55.5 Gy), or high (>55.5 Gy). With reference to the low-BED group, the HR was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85-1.18) for the medium-BED group and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.31) for the high-BED group. The univariable p = 0.076 and multivariable p = 0.16.

CONCLUSIONS

For LA-NSCLC patients treated with concurrent CRT, IF-TRT was associated with significantly better survival than ENI-TRT. TRT total and BED dose levels were not significantly associated with patient survival. Future progress will require research focusing on better systemic therapy and TRT.

摘要

简介

同期放化疗(CRT)是局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在探讨胸部放疗(TRT)参数及其对患者生存的影响。

方法

我们从参与 16 项同期 CRT 合作组试验的 3600 例 LA-NSCLC 患者中收集了个体患者数据。检查的主要 TRT 参数包括野设计策略(选择性淋巴结照射[ENI]与累及野 TRT[IF-TRT])、总剂量和生物有效剂量(BED)。使用单变量和多变量 Cox 模型计算总生存率的风险比(HRs)。

结果

TRT 剂量范围为 60Gy 至 74Gy,大多数治疗方案为每日一次。与 IF-TRT 相比,ENI 与较差的生存相关(单变量 HR=1.37,95%置信区间[CI]:1.24-1.51,p<0.0001;多变量 HR=1.31,95% CI:1.08-1.59,p=0.002)。IF 和 ENI 患者的中位生存时间分别为 24 个月和 16 个月。患者被分为三组剂量:低总剂量(60Gy)、中总剂量(>60Gy 至 66Gy)和高总剂量(>66Gy 至 74Gy)。与低剂量组相比,中剂量组的多变量 HR 为 1.08(95%CI:0.93-1.25),高剂量组为 1.12(95%CI:0.97-1.30)。单变量 p=0.054,多变量 p=0.17。BED 分为以下三组:低(<55.5Gy)、中(55.5Gy)或高(>55.5Gy)。与低 BED 组相比,中 BED 组的 HR 为 1.00(95%CI:0.85-1.18),高 BED 组的 HR 为 1.10(95%CI:0.93-1.31)。单变量 p=0.076,多变量 p=0.16。

结论

对于接受同期 CRT 治疗的 LA-NSCLC 患者,IF-TRT 与 ENI-TRT 相比,显著提高了生存获益。TRT 总剂量和 BED 剂量水平与患者生存无显著相关性。未来的进展需要专注于更好的系统治疗和 TRT 的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验