• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用结构方程模型分析日本药学专业学生学习过程与学习动机概况之间的关系

An Analysis of the Relationship between the Learning Process and Learning Motivation Profiles of Japanese Pharmacy Students Using Structural Equation Modeling.

作者信息

Yamamura Shigeo, Takehira Rieko

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai International University, Chiba 283-8555, Japan.

Department of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Shirogane, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Apr 23;6(2):35. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020035.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy6020035
PMID:29690577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6024982/
Abstract

Pharmacy students in Japan have to maintain strong motivation to learn for six years during their education. The authors explored the students’ learning structure. All pharmacy students in their 4th through to 6th year at Josai International University participated in the survey. The revised two factor study process questionnaire and science motivation questionnaire II were used to assess their learning process and learning motivation profiles, respectively. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine a causal relationship between the latent variables in the learning process and those in the learning motivation profile. The learning structure was modeled on the idea that the learning process affects the learning motivation profile of respondents. In the multi-group SEM, the estimated mean of the deep learning to learning motivation profile increased just after their clinical clerkship for 6th year students. This indicated that the clinical experience benefited students’ deep learning, which is probably because the experience of meeting with real patients encourages meaningful learning in pharmacy studies.

摘要

日本的药学专业学生在六年的学习期间必须保持强烈的学习动力。作者探究了学生的学习结构。所有就读于城西国际大学四年级至六年级的药学专业学生参与了此次调查。修订后的两因素学习过程问卷和科学动机问卷II分别用于评估他们的学习过程和学习动机特征。结构方程模型(SEM)用于检验学习过程中的潜在变量与学习动机特征中的潜在变量之间的因果关系。学习结构是基于学习过程影响受访者学习动机特征这一理念构建的。在多组结构方程模型中,六年级学生在临床实习后深度学习与学习动机特征的估计均值随即增加。这表明临床经验对学生的深度学习有益,这可能是因为与真实患者接触的经历促进了药学学习中的有意义学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ff2/6024982/540f2adcb25d/pharmacy-06-00035-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ff2/6024982/82a75fb78ddd/pharmacy-06-00035-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ff2/6024982/540f2adcb25d/pharmacy-06-00035-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ff2/6024982/82a75fb78ddd/pharmacy-06-00035-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ff2/6024982/540f2adcb25d/pharmacy-06-00035-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
An Analysis of the Relationship between the Learning Process and Learning Motivation Profiles of Japanese Pharmacy Students Using Structural Equation Modeling.运用结构方程模型分析日本药学专业学生学习过程与学习动机概况之间的关系
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Apr 23;6(2):35. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020035.
2
Effect of practical training on the learning motivation profile of Japanese pharmacy students using structural equation modeling.基于结构方程模型的实践培训对日本药学专业学生学习动机状况的影响
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Feb 7;14:2. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.2. eCollection 2017.
3
Motivational component profiles in university students learning histology: a comparative study between genders and different health science curricula.大学生组织学学习动机成分分析:不同性别和不同健康科学课程的比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Mar 10;14:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-46.
4
Teaching quality: High school students' autonomy and competence.教学质量:高中生的自主性和能力。
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):218-223. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.23.
5
The Mediating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation to Learn on the Relationship between Student´s Autonomy Support and Vitality and Deep Learning.内在学习动机在学生自主支持与活力及深度学习关系中的中介作用
Span J Psychol. 2016 Jul 18;19:E42. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.43.
6
Exploring the relationships between epistemic beliefs about medicine and approaches to learning medicine: a structural equation modeling analysis.探索关于医学的认知信念与医学学习方法之间的关系:一项结构方程模型分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 18;16:181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0707-0.
7
How Students' Motivation and Learning Experience Affect Their Service-Learning Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.学生的动机和学习体验如何影响他们的服务学习成果:一项结构方程模型分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 18;13:825902. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825902. eCollection 2022.
8
[Effects of practical training to increase motivation for learning and related factors].[实践培训对提高学习动机及相关因素的影响]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2014;134(11):1227-35. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00173.
9
Between students' instrumental goals and how they learn: goal content is the gap to mind.在学生的工具性目标与其学习方式之间:目标内容是通向思维的差距。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Dec;84(Pt 4):612-30. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12052. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
An explanatory model of maths achievement:Perceived parental involvement and academic motivation.数学成绩的一种解释模型:感知到的父母参与度和学习动机。
Psicothema. 2017 May;29(2):184-190. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.32.

引用本文的文献

1
The Types of Learning Approaches Used by Engineering Students in Three Scenarios: An Adaptation of the R-SPQ-2F to China.工程专业学生在三种情境下使用的学习方法类型:R-SPQ-2F在中国的适应性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:944588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944588. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of Emotional Stress of Teachers in Japanese Teaching Process Based on EEG Signal Analysis.基于脑电信号分析的日语教学过程中教师情绪压力分析。
Occup Ther Int. 2022 Jun 29;2022:2593338. doi: 10.1155/2022/2593338. eCollection 2022.
3
The evaluation of stomatology English education in China based on 'Guanghua cup' international clinical skill exhibition activity.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Professional Identity in Undergraduate Pharmacy Students: A Role for Self-Determination Theory.培养本科药学专业学生的职业认同感:自我决定理论的作用
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Mar 24;5(2):16. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020016.
2
Research into experiential learning in nurse education.护士教育中的体验式学习研究。
Br J Nurs. 2017 Sep 7;26(16):932-938. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.16.932.
3
Effect of practical training on the learning motivation profile of Japanese pharmacy students using structural equation modeling.基于结构方程模型的实践培训对日本药学专业学生学习动机状况的影响
基于“光华杯”国际临床技能展示活动对我国口腔医学英语教育的评价
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02389-7.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Feb 7;14:2. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.2. eCollection 2017.
4
A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems.不同教育体系下护理专业学生的学习过程、动机资源与动机问题之间的关系研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jan;48:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Determinants and outcomes of motivation in health professions education: a systematic review based on self-determination theory.卫生专业教育中动机的决定因素及结果:基于自我决定理论的系统评价
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 May 2;13:19. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.19. eCollection 2016.
6
Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature.基于问题的学习中的深度学习与表面学习:文献综述
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Dec;21(5):1087-1112. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
7
Motivational profiles of medical students: association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion.医学生的动机特征:与学习投入度、学业成绩和疲惫感的关联。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jun 19;13:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-87.
8
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
9
The effect of problem-based learning on students' approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education.基于问题的学习对临床护理教育背景下学生学习方法的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Jul;26(5):430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
10
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.修订后的双因素学习过程问卷:R-SPQ-2F。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Mar;71(Pt 1):133-49. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433.