Biggs J, Kember D, Leung D Y
University of Hong Kong.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Mar;71(Pt 1):133-49. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433.
To produce a revised two-factor version of the Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) suitable for use by teachers in evaluating the learning approaches of their students. The revised instrument assesses deep and surface approaches only, using fewer items.
A set of 43 items was drawn up for the initial tests. These were derived from: the original version of the SPQ, modified items from the SPQ, and new items. A process of testing and refinement eventuated in deep and surface motive and strategy scales each with 5 items, 10 items per approach score. The final version was tested using reliability procedures and confirmatory factor analysis.
The sample for the testing and refinement process consisted of 229 students from the health sciences faculty of a university in Hong Kong. A fresh sample of 495 undergraduate students from a variety of departments of the same university was used for the test of the final version.
The final version of the questionnaire had acceptable Cronbach alpha values for scale reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit to the intended two-factor structure. Both deep and surface approach scales had well identified motive and strategy subscales.
The revision process has resulted in a simple questionnaire which teachers can use to evaluate their own teaching and the learning approaches of their students.
编制一份修订后的两因素版学习过程问卷(R-SPQ-2F),供教师用于评估学生的学习方法。修订后的工具仅评估深层和表层学习方法,使用的项目更少。
为初始测试拟定了一组43个项目。这些项目来源于:SPQ的原始版本、SPQ的修改项目以及新的项目。经过测试和完善过程,最终形成了深层和表层动机与策略量表,每个量表各有5个项目,每种学习方法得分有10个项目。最终版本通过信度程序和验证性因素分析进行了测试。
测试和完善过程的样本包括香港一所大学健康科学学院的229名学生。最终版本的测试使用了同一所大学不同院系的495名本科生作为新样本。
问卷的最终版本在量表信度方面具有可接受的克朗巴哈α值。验证性因素分析表明与预期的两因素结构拟合良好。深层和表层学习方法量表都有明确的动机和策略子量表。
修订过程产生了一份简单的问卷,教师可以用它来评估自己的教学以及学生的学习方法。