Suppr超能文献

激光开窗术联合非顺应性球囊与切割球囊扩张治疗主动脉覆膜支架内再狭窄:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

Laser Fenestration of Aortic Stent-Grafts Followed by Noncompliant vs Cutting Balloon Dilation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.

机构信息

1 Key Laboratory of Textile Science & Technology, Ministry of Education and College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.

2 Division of Vascular Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Sentara Heart Hospital, Norfolk, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Jun;25(3):397-407. doi: 10.1177/1526602818772311. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of in situ laser fenestration and subsequent balloon dilation (noncompliant vs cutting) on the graft fabric of 4 aortic stent-graft models.

METHOD

In an in vitro setup, the Zenith TX2, Talent, Endurant, and Anaconda aortic stent-grafts (all made of polyester graft material) were subjected to laser fenestration with a 2.3-mm-diameter probe at low and high energy in a physiologic saline solution followed by balloon dilation of the hole. For the first series of tests, 6-mm-diameter noncompliant balloons were used and replaced for the second series by 6-mm-diameter cutting balloons. Each procedure was performed 5 times (5 fenestrations per balloon type). The fenestrations were examined visually and with light and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Each fenestration demonstrated various degrees of fraying and/or tearing regardless of the device. The monofilament twill weave of the Talent endograft tore in the warp direction up to 7.09±0.46 mm at high energy compared with 2.41±0.26 mm for the Endurant multifilament device. The fenestrations of the 3 endografts with multifilament weave (Zenith, Anaconda, and Endurant) showed more fraying; fenestration areas in the multifilament Endurant were >10 mm at low and high energy. The fenestrations were free of melted fibers, but minor blackening of the filaments was observed in all devices. Overall, the cutting balloons resulted in worse tearing and damage. Of note, the edges of the dilated laser-formed fenestrations of the Talent and the Endurant grafts demonstrated evidence of additional shredded yarns.

CONCLUSION

In situ fenestration does not cause any melting of the polyester; however, the observed structural damage to the fabric construction must be carefully considered. Cutting balloons caused various levels of tearing compared to the noncompliant balloons and cannot be recommended for use in this application. Rather, noncompliant balloons should be employed, but only with endografts constructed from multifilament yarns. The use of in situ fenestration must be restricted to urgent and emergent cases until long-term durability can be determined.

摘要

目的

研究原位激光开窗和随后的球囊扩张(顺应性与切割)对 4 种主动脉支架移植物模型的移植物织物的影响。

方法

在体外环境中,使用 Zenith TX2、Talent、Endurant 和 Anaconda 主动脉支架移植物(均由聚酯移植物材料制成),在生理盐溶液中用 2.3mm 直径的探头进行激光开窗,然后对孔进行球囊扩张。对于第一系列测试,使用 6mm 直径顺应性球囊,对于第二系列测试,使用 6mm 直径切割球囊。每种程序都进行了 5 次(每种球囊类型 5 个开窗)。用肉眼和光镜、扫描电子显微镜检查开窗情况。

结果

无论使用哪种设备,每个开窗都表现出不同程度的磨损和/或撕裂。与多丝 Endurant 装置相比,高能量下 Talent 内支架的单丝斜纹编织物沿经向撕裂高达 7.09±0.46mm,而多丝装置的撕裂长度为 2.41±0.26mm。3 种多丝编织内支架(Zenith、Anaconda 和 Endurant)的开窗显示出更多的磨损;低能量和高能量下,多丝 Endurant 的开窗面积>10mm。开窗处无熔融纤维,但所有装置的纤维都有轻微的黑化。总体而言,切割球囊导致更严重的撕裂和损伤。值得注意的是,Talent 和 Endurant 移植物扩张后的激光开窗边缘显示出额外的纱线撕裂。

结论

原位开窗不会导致聚酯纤维的任何熔化;然而,必须仔细考虑观察到的织物结构损坏。与顺应性球囊相比,切割球囊导致不同程度的撕裂,因此不能推荐用于这种应用。相反,应使用顺应性球囊,但只能用于多丝纱线制成的内支架。在确定长期耐久性之前,必须将原位开窗的使用限制在紧急和紧急情况下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验