Suppr超能文献

三种不同制作技术制作的修复体边缘与内部适合性的比较:一项研究。

Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of copings fabricated from three different fabrication techniques: An study.

作者信息

Arora Aman, Yadav Avneet, Upadhyaya Viram, Jain Prachi, Verma Mrinalini

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, J.N Kapoor, DAV (C) Dental College, Yamuanagar, Haryana, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):102-107. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_327_17.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) copings fabricated from conventional wax pattern, three-dimensional (3D)-printed resin pattern, and laser sintering technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of thirty copings were made, out of which ten copings were made from 3D-printed resin pattern (Group A), ten from inlay wax pattern (Group B), and ten copings were obtained from direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technique (Group C). All the thirty samples were seated on their respective dies and sectioned carefully using a laser jet cutter and were evaluated for marginal and internal gaps at the predetermined areas using a stereomicroscope. The values were then analyzed using one-way ANOVA test and Bonferroni test.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA showed lowest mean marginal discrepancy for DMLS and highest value for copings fabricated from inlay wax. The values for internal discrepancy were highest for DMLS (169.38) and lowest for 3D-printed resin pattern fabricated copings (133.87). Bonferroni test for both marginal and internal discrepancies showed nonsignificant difference when Group A was compared to Group B ( > 0.05) and significant when Group A was compared with Group C ( < 0.05). Group B showed significant difference ( < 0.05) when compared with Group C.

CONCLUSION

Marginal and internal discrepancies of all the three casting techniques were within clinically acceptable values. Marginal fit of DMLS was superior as compared to other two techniques, whereas when internal fit was evaluated, conventional technique showed the best internal fit.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较由传统蜡型、三维(3D)打印树脂型和激光烧结技术制作的钴铬(Co-Cr)冠的边缘适应性和内部适应性。

材料与方法

共制作30个冠,其中10个冠由3D打印树脂型制作(A组),10个由嵌体蜡型制作(B组),10个冠通过直接金属激光烧结(DMLS)技术获得(C组)。所有30个样本就位在各自的代型上,使用激光切割机小心地进行切片,并使用体视显微镜在预定区域评估边缘和内部间隙。然后使用单因素方差分析和Bonferroni检验对这些值进行分析。

结果

单因素方差分析显示,DMLS的平均边缘差异最低,嵌体蜡制作的冠的边缘差异最高。内部差异值DMLS最高(169.38),3D打印树脂型制作的冠最低(133.87)。边缘和内部差异的Bonferroni检验显示,A组与B组比较时差异无统计学意义(>0.05),A组与C组比较时有统计学意义(<0.05)。B组与C组比较时有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

所有三种铸造技术的边缘和内部差异均在临床可接受范围内。与其他两种技术相比,DMLS的边缘适合性更好,而在评估内部适合性时,传统技术显示出最佳的内部适合性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0b/5903172/64b67eb06638/JIPS-18-102-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验