Kansay Sonam, Singh Harinder
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Department of Community Medicine, Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
J Lab Physicians. 2018 Apr-Jun;10(2):173-178. doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_10_17.
The frequency of dengue outbreak is increasing in Southeast Asian countries these days and since there are no specific drugs against the dengue virus; therefore, treatment consists of mainly symptomatic and supportive care.
Platelet transfusion forms one of the major parts of treatment therapy in dengue; therefore, this study was initiated to elicit the effect of introduction of single-donor apheresis platelets (SDAPs) in dengue management.
This is a retrospective study conducted on 622 clinically suspected cases of dengue infection who received platelet transfusions between August 2013 and December 2015 in a teaching hospital of North India.
Clinical data, reports of hematological investigation, transfusion request forms, platelet requirements, and data obtained from daily follow-up and blood bank records were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20.
Average platelet count at which platelet transfusion initiated was 25,703/cumm. Average number of random donor platelets (RDPs) transfused significantly decreased in 2015 (2013 vs. 2015 is 5.4 vs. 4.3) due to the transfusion of SDAP to patients with very low platelet count and those with superimposed high-risk factors. Mean length of stay in hospital was similar for patients receiving RDP only and for those receiving RDP and SDAP both (5.48 vs. 5.54) while that for patients receiving SDAP only was quite lower (3.6). Overall cost of stay was higher for those receiving SDAP transfusions.
Decision for initiating platelet transfusions and calculating its dose for dengue patients is highly variable, but transfusing high-dose platelets such as SDAP at an appropriate stage can reduce further requirement of platelet transfusions, fasten the recovery, reduce the hospital stay, lower the risk of transfusion-associated adverse reactions, and can further minimize the associated morbidity and mortality.
近年来,东南亚国家登革热疫情爆发频率不断增加,且由于尚无针对登革热病毒的特效药物,因此治疗主要包括对症治疗和支持治疗。
血小板输注是登革热治疗的主要组成部分之一,因此开展本研究以探讨单采血小板(SDAP)用于登革热治疗的效果。
这是一项回顾性研究,对2013年8月至2015年12月期间在印度北部一家教学医院接受血小板输注的622例临床疑似登革热感染病例进行了研究。
使用IBM SPSS 20版对临床数据、血液学检查报告、输血申请表、血小板需求量以及每日随访和血库记录中获取的数据进行分析。
开始血小板输注时的平均血小板计数为25,703/立方毫米。2015年,随机供者血小板(RDP)的平均输注量显著下降(2013年与2015年分别为5.4和4.3),原因是向血小板计数极低和伴有高危因素的患者输注了SDAP。仅接受RDP输注的患者与同时接受RDP和SDAP输注的患者的平均住院时间相似(分别为5.48天和5.54天),而仅接受SDAP输注的患者住院时间则短得多(3.6天)。接受SDAP输注患者的总体住院费用更高。
登革热患者开始血小板输注的决策及其剂量计算差异很大,但在适当阶段输注高剂量血小板(如SDAP)可减少血小板进一步输注需求,加快康复,缩短住院时间,降低输血相关不良反应风险,并可进一步降低相关发病率和死亡率。