Laboratory of Neuropsychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Clinical Neuropsychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Clinical Neuropsychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jul;265:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.045. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
Although previous studies have extensively documented the cross-sectional relationship between cognitive impairment and psychological distress, findings relating to their longitudinal associations remains mixed. The present study examines the longitudinal associations and mutual influence between cognitive functioning and psychological distress across six months among community-dwelling elderly in Hong Kong. A total of 162 older adults (40 males; M = 69.8 years, SD = 6.4) were administered objective and subjective measures of cognitive functioning, as well as self-reported ratings of distress, at two time points six months apart. Using structural equation modeling, we tested the cross-lagged relationships between cognitive functioning and distress. Our cross-lagged model indicated that cognitive functioning at baseline significantly predicted subsequent psychological distress. However, distress was not significantly associated with subsequent cognitive functioning. Additionally, the objective and subjective measures of cognitive functioning were not significantly correlated. These findings suggested that distress may occur as a consequence of poorer cognitive functioning in elderly, but not vice versa. The lack of correlation between objective and subjective cognitive measures suggested that the participants may not have adequate insight into their cognitive abilities. The implications of these findings are discussed.
虽然先前的研究广泛记录了认知障碍与心理困扰之间的横断面关系,但关于它们纵向关联的研究结果仍然存在分歧。本研究考察了香港社区居住的老年人在六个月内认知功能和心理困扰之间的纵向关联和相互影响。共有 162 名老年人(40 名男性;M=69.8 岁,SD=6.4)在两次相隔六个月的时间内接受了认知功能的客观和主观测量以及自我报告的困扰评分。使用结构方程模型,我们测试了认知功能和困扰之间的交叉滞后关系。我们的交叉滞后模型表明,基线时的认知功能显著预测了随后的心理困扰。然而,困扰与随后的认知功能没有显著相关。此外,认知功能的客观和主观测量之间没有显著相关性。这些发现表明,在老年人中,困扰可能是认知功能较差的结果,但反之则不然。客观和主观认知测量之间缺乏相关性表明,参与者可能对自己的认知能力没有足够的洞察力。讨论了这些发现的意义。