Reducing Waste and Increasing the Usability of Psychiatry Research: The Family of EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines and One of Its Newest Members: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
作者信息
Thombs Brett D, Levis Brooke, Rice Danielle B, Wu Yin, Benedetti Andrea
机构信息
1 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2 Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
出版信息
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;63(8):509-512. doi: 10.1177/0706743718773705. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reducing Waste and Increasing the Usability of Psychiatry Research: The Family of EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines and One of Its Newest Members: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.减少精神医学研究的浪费并提高其可用性：EQUATOR报告指南系列及其最新成员之一：PRISMA-DTA声明。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;63(8):509-512. doi: 10.1177/0706743718773705. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
[The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].[PRISMA声明——关于系统评价应报告哪些内容？]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Aug;134(33):1619. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1233989. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
3
Enhancing the Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Vascular Surgery: PRISMA 2020.加强血管外科系统评价和Meta分析的报告：PRISMA 2020
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):664-666. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Continuing the Terra Firma and Establishing a New EQUATOR for Anesthesia & Analgesia.坚守坚实基础，为麻醉与镇痛建立新的平衡准则。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):8-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001304.
5
[Scientific reporting guidelines].[科学报告指南]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Nov 19;129(22):2340. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1099.
6
Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.提升残疾与康复研究的质量：强制使用报告指南。
Disabil Health J. 2014 Apr;7(2):131-3. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
7
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.评价系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目（PRISMA）声明及其扩展的采用和影响：范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.
8
Research and publishing.研究与出版。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Dec;132(6):423. doi: 10.1111/acps.12493. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Publishing what's important.发表重要内容。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Dec;132(6):417-8. doi: 10.1111/acps.12487. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
10
A handmaiden to science: the role of the editor in psychiatric research.科学的女仆：编辑在精神病学研究中的作用。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Dec;132(6):428. doi: 10.1111/acps.12485. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Structured reporting to improve transparency of analyses in prognostic marker studies.结构报告提高预后标志物研究分析透明度。
BMC Med. 2022 May 12;20(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02304-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.诊断测试准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA-DTA 声明。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163.
2
Selective Cutoff Reporting in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Comparison of Conventional and Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analyses of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Screening Tool.诊断试验准确性研究中的选择性截断报告：患者健康问卷-9抑郁筛查工具的传统荟萃分析与个体患者数据荟萃分析的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 May 15;185(10):954-964. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww191.
3
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南：解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
4
Reporting completeness and transparency of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: A comparison of meta-analyses published before and after the PRISMA statement.抑郁症筛查工具准确性的Meta分析报告的完整性与透明度：PRISMA声明前后发表的Meta分析比较
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Aug;87:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
Methodological quality of meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools.抑郁症筛查工具诊断准确性的Meta分析的方法学质量
J Psychosom Res. 2016 May;84:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Sample sizes and precision of estimates of sensitivity and specificity from primary studies on the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools: a survey of recently published studies.抑郁症筛查工具诊断准确性的原始研究中敏感性和特异性估计值的样本量及精度：近期发表研究的调查
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Jun;25(2):145-52. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1504. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
7
Risk of Bias from Inclusion of Currently Diagnosed or Treated Patients in Studies of Depression Screening Tool Accuracy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Recently Published Primary Studies and Meta-Analyses.抑郁症筛查工具准确性研究中纳入当前已确诊或正在接受治疗患者的偏倚风险：近期发表的原发性研究和荟萃分析的横断面分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0150067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150067. eCollection 2016.
8
The diagnostic accuracy of brief versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年抑郁量表简版的诊断准确性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;31(8):837-57. doi: 10.1002/gps.4407. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 2015：报告诊断准确性研究的必备项目更新清单。
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
10
Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis.使用患者健康问卷（PHQ-9）筛查和发现重度抑郁症：一项荟萃分析。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):567-76. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
Zotero 插件