Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00186, Rome, Italy.
Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Sezione Igiene, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1365-1374. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0980-4. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major health issue worldwide. New generation of direct-active antiviral medications is an epoch-making turning point in the management of HCV infections.
Conducing a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir and sofosbuvir + pegylated interferon/ribavirin for the management of all HCV patients (even those in the initial stages of fibrosis).
A Markov model was built on the natural history of the disease to assess the efficacy of the alternatives. The outcomes are expressed in terms of quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) and result in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio).
Elbasvir/grazoprevir implies an expenditure of €21,104,253.74 with a gain of 19,287.90 QALYs and sofosbuvir + pegylated interferon/ribavirin implies an expenditure of €31,904,410.11 with a gain of 18,855.96 QALYs. Elbasvir/grazoprevir is thus a dominant strategy.
Consideration should be given to the opportunity cost of not treating patients with a lower degree of fibrosis (F0-F2).
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)是全球范围内的一个主要健康问题。新一代直接作用抗病毒药物是 HCV 感染治疗的一个划时代的转折点。
对 elbasvir/grazoprevir 联合 sofosbuvir + 聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林治疗所有 HCV 患者(甚至纤维化早期患者)进行成本效益分析。
建立一个疾病自然史的 Markov 模型来评估替代方案的疗效。结果以质量调整生命年(QALYs)表示,并以增量成本效益比(ICER)表示。
elbasvir/grazoprevir 的支出为 21104253.74 欧元,获得 19287.90 个 QALYs;sofosbuvir + 聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林的支出为 31904410.11 欧元,获得 18855.96 个 QALYs。因此,elbasvir/grazoprevir 是一种优势策略。
应考虑不治疗纤维化程度较低(F0-F2)患者的机会成本。