• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness model for hepatitis C screening and treatment: Implications for Egypt and other countries with high prevalence.丙型肝炎筛查与治疗的成本效益模型:对埃及及其他高流行率国家的启示
Glob Public Health. 2015;10(3):296-317. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.984742. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
2
Cost effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy for treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection in the veterans health administration.直接作用抗病毒治疗在退伍军人管理局治疗初治慢性 HCV 基因型 1 感染患者中的成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 May 22.
3
Cost-effectiveness of novel regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus.新型丙型肝炎病毒治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 17;162(6):407-19. doi: 10.7326/M14-1152.
4
Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(40kDa)联合利巴韦林治疗HIV与丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的成本效益分析
J Clin Virol. 2006 Aug;36(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
5
Screening for Hepatitis C in injecting drug users: a cost utility analysis.对注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎筛查:成本效用分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):61-71. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh109.
6
Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis.30个国家丙型肝炎新药的价格、成本及可负担性:一项经济分析
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032. eCollection 2016 May.
7
Economic evaluation of Zepatier for the management of HCV in the Italian scenario.泽必泰用于意大利 HCV 管理的经济学评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1365-1374. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0980-4. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
8
Timing of hepatitis C antiviral therapy in patients with advanced liver disease: a decision analysis model.晚期肝病患者丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗时机:决策分析模型。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Jun;16(6):748-59. doi: 10.1002/lt.22072.
9
Cost effectiveness of hepatitis C-related interventions targeting substance users and other high-risk groups: a systematic review.针对药物使用者和其他高危人群的丙型肝炎相关干预措施的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Nov 1;30(11):1015-34. doi: 10.2165/11597660-000000000-00000.
10
Cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in an evolving patient population.不断变化的患者群体中慢性丙型肝炎感染治疗的成本效益
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):228-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.228.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of hepatitis C virus elimination in China: A modelling study.中国丙型肝炎病毒消除的成本效益和投资回报率:一项建模研究。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025 Apr;31(2):394-408. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0664. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Patterns and trends of hepatitis C virus infection in Jordan: an observational study.约旦丙型肝炎病毒感染的模式和趋势:一项观察性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 7;11:1280427. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1280427. eCollection 2023.
3
Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions.健康经济学研究是否与中东和北非地区的疾病负担一致?公共卫生干预措施的经济评估研究的系统评价。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Jul 25;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y.
4
Paper microfluidic implementation of loop mediated isothermal amplification for early diagnosis of hepatitis C virus.基于纸芯片的环介导等温扩增技术在丙型肝炎病毒早期诊断中的应用
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 30;12(1):6994. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27076-z.
5
Health and economic benefits of achieving hepatitis C virus elimination in Pakistan: A modelling study and economic analysis.在巴基斯坦实现丙型肝炎病毒消除的健康和经济效益:建模研究和经济分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 19;18(10):e1003818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003818. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Hepatitis C Diagnosis: Simplified Solutions, Predictive Barriers, and Future Promises.丙型肝炎诊断:简化方案、预测障碍及未来前景
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;11(7):1253. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071253.
7
Developing and Maintaining a Global Research Training Infrastructure for Cancer Education.发展和维护癌症教育的全球研究培训基础设施。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jul;36(Suppl 1):41-49. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02033-y. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
8
Multicolorimetric ELISA biosensors on a paper/polymer hybrid analytical device for visual point-of-care detection of infection diseases.纸/聚合物混合分析装置上的多色酶联免疫吸附生物传感器,用于感染性疾病的现场即时可视化检测。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021 Jul;413(18):4655-4663. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03359-8. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Cost and cost-effectiveness of a real-world HCV treatment program among HIV-infected individuals in Myanmar.缅甸 HIV 感染者真实世界 HCV 治疗方案的成本和成本效益。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004181.
10
Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination strategies among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Tijuana, Mexico.墨西哥蒂华纳市注射吸毒者中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)消除策略的成本效益
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2734-2745. doi: 10.1111/add.15456. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of immediate versus delayed treatment of hepatitis C virus-infected patients in a country with limited resources: the case of Egypt.在资源有限的国家中,立即治疗与延迟治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的效果和成本效益:以埃及为例。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(8):1064-71. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu066. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
2
Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection.索磷布韦片治疗未经治疗的慢性丙型肝炎感染。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1878-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214853. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening for chronic hepatitis C infection in the United States.美国基于危险因素和出生队列的慢性丙型肝炎感染筛查的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058975. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
4
Sofosbuvir with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for treatment-naive patients with hepatitis C genotype-1 infection (ATOMIC): an open-label, randomised, multicentre phase 2 trial.索磷布韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a 和利巴韦林治疗初治慢性丙型肝炎病毒基因型 1 感染患者(ATOMIC):一项开放标签、随机、多中心 2 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2013 Jun 15;381(9883):2100-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60247-0. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
5
Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic hepatitis C infection in the United States.美国慢性丙型肝炎感染筛查的成本效益。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1382-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit069. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
6
The cost-effectiveness of birth-cohort screening for hepatitis C antibody in U.S. primary care settings.美国初级保健环境中基于出生队列的丙型肝炎抗体筛查的成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 21;156(4):263-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00378. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
7
Cost effectiveness and quality of life considerations in the treatment of hepatitis C infection.丙型肝炎感染治疗中的成本效益与生活质量考量
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;2:87-96. doi: 10.2147/ceor.s7283. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
8
Using medicare data for comparative effectiveness research: opportunities and challenges.利用医疗保险数据进行比较有效性研究:机遇与挑战。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(7):488-96.
9
Managing patients with hepatitis‑B-related or hepatitis‑C-related decompensated cirrhosis.管理乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎相关失代偿性肝硬化患者。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 May;8(5):285-95. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.57.
10
Aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression.美国丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 感染者的老龄化:HCV 流行率和疾病进展的多队列模型。
Gastroenterology. 2010 Feb;138(2):513-21, 521.e1-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.067. Epub 2009 Oct 25.

丙型肝炎筛查与治疗的成本效益模型:对埃及及其他高流行率国家的启示

Cost-effectiveness model for hepatitis C screening and treatment: Implications for Egypt and other countries with high prevalence.

作者信息

Kim David D, Hutton David W, Raouf Ahmed A, Salama Mohsen, Hablas Ahmed, Seifeldin Ibrahim A, Soliman Amr S

机构信息

a Department of Health Services , University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2015;10(3):296-317. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.984742. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2014.984742
PMID:25469976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4320005/
Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer, and many developing countries report intermediate-to-high prevalence. However, the economic impact of screening and treatment for HCV in high prevalence countries has not been well studied. Thus, we examined the cost-effectiveness of screening and treatment for HCV infection for asymptomatic, average-risk adults using a Markov decision analytic model. In our model, we collected age-specific prevalence, disease progression rates for Egyptians and local cost estimates in Egypt, which has the highest prevalence of HCV infection (15%) in the world. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and conducted sensitivity analyses to determine how cost-effective HCV screening and treatment might be in other developing countries with high and intermediate prevalence. In Egypt, implementing a screening programme using triple-therapy treatment (sofosbuvir with pegylated interferon and ribavirin) was dominant compared with no screening because it would have lower total costs and improve health outcomes. HCV screening and treatment would also be cost-effective in global settings with intermediate costs of drug treatment ($8000) and a higher sustained viral response rate (70-80%).

摘要

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染是肝硬化和肝癌的主要病因,许多发展中国家报告其感染率处于中高水平。然而,在高感染率国家,HCV筛查和治疗的经济影响尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们使用马尔可夫决策分析模型,研究了对无症状、平均风险成年人进行HCV感染筛查和治疗的成本效益。在我们的模型中,我们收集了埃及人的年龄特异性感染率、疾病进展率以及埃及的当地成本估计数据,埃及是世界上HCV感染率最高(约15%)的国家。我们估计了增量成本效益比,并进行了敏感性分析,以确定在其他高感染率和中等感染率的发展中国家,HCV筛查和治疗的成本效益如何。在埃及,与不进行筛查相比,实施使用三联疗法(索磷布韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林)的筛查计划具有优势,因为它将降低总成本并改善健康结果。在药物治疗成本中等(约8000美元)且持续病毒学应答率较高(70 - 80%)的全球环境中,HCV筛查和治疗也具有成本效益。