Mehta T, Desai N, Mehta K, Parikh R, Male S, Hussain M, Ollenschleger M, Spiegel G, Grande A, Ezzeddine M, Jagadeesan B, Tummala R, McCullough L
1 Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
2 Department of Neurology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;24(4):392-397. doi: 10.1177/1591019918768574. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
Introduction Proximal cervical internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 50% merits revascularization to mitigate the risk of stroke recurrence among large-vessel anterior circulation strokes undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Carotid artery stenting necessitates the use of antiplatelets, and there is a theoretical increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation given that such patients may already have received intravenous thrombolytics and have a significant infarct burden. We investigate the outcomes of large-vessel anterior circulation stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolytics receiving same-day carotid stenting or selective angioplasty compared to no carotid intervention. Materials and methods The study cohort was obtained from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database between 2006 and 2014, using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, ninth revision discharge diagnosis and procedure codes. A total of 11,825 patients with large-vessel anterior circulation stroke treated with intravenous thrombolytic and mechanical thrombectomy on the same day were identified. The study population was subdivided into three subgroups: no carotid intervention, same-day carotid angioplasty without carotid stenting, and same-day carotid stenting. Outcomes were assessed with respect to mortality, significant disability at discharge, hemorrhagic transformation, and requirement of percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tube placement, prolonged mechanical ventilation, or craniotomy. Results This study found no statistically significant difference in patient outcomes in those treated with concurrent carotid stenting compared to no carotid intervention in terms of morbidity or mortality. Conclusions If indicated, it is reasonable to consider concurrent carotid stenting and/or angioplasty for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy who also receive intravenous thrombolytics.
引言 近端颈内动脉狭窄超过50%时,对于接受机械取栓术的前循环大血管卒中患者,应进行血运重建以降低卒中复发风险。颈动脉支架置入术需要使用抗血小板药物,鉴于此类患者可能已经接受了静脉溶栓治疗且梗死灶较大,理论上出血转化风险会增加。我们比较了接受静脉溶栓治疗的前循环大血管卒中患者在同一天接受颈动脉支架置入术或选择性血管成形术与未进行颈动脉干预的治疗效果。
材料与方法 本研究队列来自2006年至2014年的国家(全国)住院患者样本数据库,使用国际疾病分类第九版的出院诊断和手术编码。共识别出11825例在同一天接受静脉溶栓和机械取栓治疗的前循环大血管卒中患者。研究人群分为三个亚组:未进行颈动脉干预、同一天进行无颈动脉支架置入的颈动脉血管成形术、同一天进行颈动脉支架置入术。评估指标包括死亡率、出院时严重残疾、出血转化以及是否需要放置经皮内镜胃造瘘管、延长机械通气或开颅手术。
结果 本研究发现,与未进行颈动脉干预的患者相比,同时接受颈动脉支架置入术的患者在发病率或死亡率方面的治疗效果无统计学显著差异。
结论 如果有指征,对于接受机械取栓术且同时接受静脉溶栓治疗的前循环大血管卒中患者,考虑同时进行颈动脉支架置入术和/或血管成形术是合理的。