Madison, Wis.; and Cairo, Egypt.
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Cairo University.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1106-1113. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004275.
Social media are used for information sharing among patients with similar health conditions, and analysis of social media activity could inform clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to use Facebook to evaluate a cohort of individuals' perceptions of and satisfaction with breast reconstruction.
In this observational study, the authors collected and analyzed posts pertaining to autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction from active Facebook groups. Patient satisfaction data were categorized, and a thematic analysis of posts was conducted. Qualitative posts were grouped based on common themes and quantitatively compared using frequency and chi-square analysis.
The authors evaluated 500 posts from two Facebook groups. Two hundred sixty-four posts referenced deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction and 117 were related to implant-based reconstruction. Among individuals referencing DIEP flap reconstruction, 52 percent were satisfied, compared with 20 percent of individuals who referenced satisfaction with implant-based reconstruction (p < 0.0001). Individuals posting about DIEP flaps reported a higher rate of unexpected side effects (p < 0.001) and numbness (p = 0.004). When referencing implant-based reconstruction, individuals reported significantly higher rates of infection, contracture, and implant failure (p < 0.001).
Based on the authors' review of social media activity, individuals undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction expressed relatively high individual satisfaction despite difficult postoperative recovery. Individuals who referenced implant-based reconstruction mentioned infection and implant failure, leading to high rates of dissatisfaction. Social media appear to provide informational and emotional support to patients. Plastic surgeons can use social media to gather unbiased information of patients' experience to inform clinical conversation and guide clinical practice.
社交媒体被用于具有相似健康状况的患者之间的信息共享,对社交媒体活动的分析可以为临床决策提供信息。本研究旨在利用 Facebook 评估一组个体对乳房重建的看法和满意度。
在这项观察性研究中,作者从活跃的 Facebook 群组中收集和分析了与自体和植入物乳房重建相关的帖子。将患者满意度数据进行分类,并对帖子进行主题分析。根据共同主题对定性帖子进行分组,并使用频率和卡方分析进行定量比较。
作者评估了两个 Facebook 群组的 500 个帖子。264 个帖子提到了深下腹直肌皮瓣(DIEP)皮瓣重建,117 个帖子与基于植入物的重建有关。在提到 DIEP 皮瓣重建的个体中,52%的个体表示满意,而提到对基于植入物的重建满意的个体比例为 20%(p<0.0001)。提到 DIEP 皮瓣的个体报告了更高的意外副作用发生率(p<0.001)和麻木感(p=0.004)。当提到基于植入物的重建时,个体报告了更高的感染、挛缩和植入物失败发生率(p<0.001)。
根据作者对社交媒体活动的审查,尽管术后恢复困难,接受 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建的个体表达了相对较高的个体满意度。提到基于植入物的重建的个体提到了感染和植入物失败,导致了较高的不满率。社交媒体似乎为患者提供了信息和情感支持。整形外科医生可以利用社交媒体收集患者体验的无偏信息,为临床对话提供信息,并指导临床实践。