Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Activity, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1153-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02776-z. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a better quality of life with one of the two techniques and if the results are in line with those already present in the literature. The hypothesis from which we started is to demonstrate that cancer patients who undergo a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction surgery are more satisfied and have a higher level of quality of life compared to those subjected to an intervention of reconstruction with prosthesis.
All patients undergoing reconstruction from January 2010 to July 2018 were eligible for inclusion. This is a retrospective cohort study carried out using the patients of two plastic surgery departments who have undergone monolateral or bilateral implant-based or DIEP flap breast reconstruction. We administered BREAST-Q questionnaire electronically almost 2 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics were analyzed using a Students t-test (continuous variables) or Chi-square/Fisher's exact test (categorical variables). Mean standard deviation BREAST-Q scores were reported for the overall cohort and by modality for the postoperative period. The linear regression model was applied to all BREAST-Q score with all predictor factors.
Of the 1125 patients involved, only 325 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study; specifically, 133 (41%) DIEP and 192 (59%) prosthetic reconstructions. We summarized the results of the principal scales of BREAST-Q module: satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with outcome, and sexual well-being in which the autologous group was always more satisfied. We reported results of all linear regression models with higher values for the DIEP group independently from predictors.
This is the first study performed on the Italian population that compares autologous surgical techniques with the implantation of breast implants. In this population, DIEP is considered the technique that leads to the highest satisfaction in all BREAST-Q scores.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
本研究旨在确定两种技术中哪一种具有更高的生活质量,以及结果是否与文献中已有的结果一致。我们的假设是证明与接受假体重建干预的患者相比,接受深部下腹壁穿支皮瓣(DIEP)乳房重建手术的癌症患者更满意,生活质量更高。
所有 2010 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间接受重建的患者均符合纳入标准。这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用两个整形外科部门的患者进行单侧或双侧植入物或 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建。我们在手术后将近 2 年时通过电子方式向患者发放 BREAST-Q 问卷。患者分为两组:植入物组和 DIEP 皮瓣自体乳房重建组。使用学生 t 检验(连续变量)或卡方/ Fisher 确切检验(分类变量)分析基线人口统计学和患者特征。报告了总体队列的平均标准差 BREAST-Q 评分和术后各模式的评分。应用线性回归模型对所有 BREAST-Q 评分和所有预测因素进行分析。
在涉及的 1125 名患者中,只有 325 名符合纳入标准并被纳入本研究;具体来说,133 名(41%)为 DIEP 重建,192 名(59%)为假体重建。我们总结了 BREAST-Q 模块主要量表的结果:对乳房的满意度、心理社会幸福感、对结果的满意度和性幸福感,其中自体组始终更满意。我们报告了所有线性回归模型的结果,DIEP 组的独立预测因子值较高。
这是第一项在意大利人群中进行的比较自体手术技术与乳房植入物植入的研究。在该人群中,DIEP 被认为是在所有 BREAST-Q 评分中导致最高满意度的技术。
证据等级 IV:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。