• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模平行测序对微操作细胞进行靶向全面疾病基因面板:上游全基因组扩增方法的比较评估。

Massively parallel sequencing of micro-manipulated cells targeting a comprehensive panel of disease-causing genes: A comparative evaluation of upstream whole-genome amplification methods.

机构信息

Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196334. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0196334
PMID:29698522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5919401/
Abstract

Single Gene Disorders (SGD) are still routinely diagnosed using PCR-based assays that need to be developed and validated for each individual disease-specific gene fragment. The TruSight One sequencing panel currently covers 12 Mb of genomic content, including 4813 genes associated with a clinical phenotype. When only a limited number of cells are available, whole genome amplification (WGA) is required prior to DNA target capture techniques such as the TruSight One panel. In this study, we compared 4 different WGA methods in combination with the TruSight One sequencing panel to perform single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping starting from 3 micro-manipulated cells. This setting simulates clinical settings such as day-5 blastocyst biopsy for Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT), liquid biopsy of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cancer-cell profiling. Bulk cell samples were processed alongside these WGA samples to serve as a performance reference. Target coverage, coverage uniformity and SNP calling accuracy obtained using any of the WGA, is inferior to the results obtained on bulk cell samples. However, results after REPLI-g come close. Compared to the other WGA methods, the method using REPLI-g WGA results in a better coverage of the targeted genomic regions with a more uniform read depth. Consequently, this method also results in a more accurate SNP calling and could be considered for clinical genotyping of a limited number of cells.

摘要

单基因疾病(SGD)仍然通过基于 PCR 的检测方法进行常规诊断,这些检测方法需要针对每个特定疾病的基因片段进行开发和验证。TruSight One 测序面板目前覆盖 12Mb 的基因组内容,包括与临床表型相关的 4813 个基因。当只有有限数量的细胞可用时,在进行 TruSight One 面板等 DNA 靶标捕获技术之前,需要进行全基因组扩增(WGA)。在这项研究中,我们比较了 4 种不同的 WGA 方法与 TruSight One 测序面板相结合,从 3 个微操作细胞开始进行单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因分型。这种设置模拟了临床情况,例如用于植入前基因检测(PGT)的第 5 天囊胚活检、循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)的液体活检和癌细胞分析。与这些 WGA 样本一起处理批量细胞样本,作为性能参考。使用任何 WGA 获得的目标覆盖率、覆盖率均匀性和 SNP 调用准确性均劣于批量细胞样本的结果。然而,REPLI-g 的结果接近。与其他 WGA 方法相比,使用 REPLI-g WGA 的方法可以更好地覆盖靶向基因组区域,并具有更均匀的读取深度。因此,这种方法还可以更准确地调用 SNP,并可考虑用于有限数量细胞的临床基因分型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/acbdf44ab29e/pone.0196334.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/c91add8bcfbb/pone.0196334.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/4688873971a1/pone.0196334.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/acbdf44ab29e/pone.0196334.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/c91add8bcfbb/pone.0196334.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/4688873971a1/pone.0196334.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2518/5919401/acbdf44ab29e/pone.0196334.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Massively parallel sequencing of micro-manipulated cells targeting a comprehensive panel of disease-causing genes: A comparative evaluation of upstream whole-genome amplification methods.大规模平行测序对微操作细胞进行靶向全面疾病基因面板:上游全基因组扩增方法的比较评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196334. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of whole genome amplification techniques for human single cell exome sequencing.用于人类单细胞外显子组测序的全基因组扩增技术比较
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171566. eCollection 2017.
3
Robust high-performance nanoliter-volume single-cell multiple displacement amplification on planar substrates.在平面基板上实现稳健的高性能纳升级单细胞多重置换扩增。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 26;113(30):8484-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520964113. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
The Performance of Whole Genome Amplification Methods and Next-Generation Sequencing for Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities.全基因组扩增方法及下一代测序技术在植入前遗传学诊断染色体异常中的性能
J Genet Genomics. 2015 Apr 20;42(4):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
Performance of a TthPrimPol-based whole genome amplification kit for copy number alteration detection using massively parallel sequencing.TthPrimPol 基全基因组扩增试剂盒在使用大规模平行测序进行拷贝数改变检测中的性能。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 22;6:31825. doi: 10.1038/srep31825.
6
Genomic Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells at the Single-Cell Level.单细胞水平循环肿瘤细胞的基因组分析。
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Jun;22(6):770-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
7
Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) Analysis on Single Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) with No Need of Whole-genome Amplification (WGA).无需全基因组扩增(WGA)的单循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)的下一代测序(NGS)分析
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2017 May-Jun;14(3):173-179. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20029.
8
Precision oncology using a limited number of cells: optimization of whole genome amplification products for sequencing applications.使用有限数量细胞的精准肿瘤学:用于测序应用的全基因组扩增产物的优化
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 1;17(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3447-6.
9
Whole genome amplification with SurePlex results in better copy number alteration detection using sequencing data compared to the MALBAC method.与MALBAC方法相比,使用SurePlex进行全基因组扩增,利用测序数据能更好地检测拷贝数变异。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 30;5:11711. doi: 10.1038/srep11711.
10
STR profiling and Copy Number Variation analysis on single, preserved cells using current Whole Genome Amplification methods.利用当前的全基因组扩增方法对单个保存细胞进行 STR 分析和拷贝数变异分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 7;7(1):17189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17525-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential performance of strategies for single-cell whole-genome amplification.单细胞全基因组扩增策略的差异表现
Cell Rep Methods. 2025 Apr 21;5(4):101025. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101025.
2
Epigenetic regulation and factors that influence the effect of iPSCs-derived neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/PCs) in the treatment of spinal cord injury.表观遗传调控及影响 iPS 细胞衍生的神经干细胞/祖细胞(NS/PCs)治疗脊髓损伤效果的因素。
Clin Epigenetics. 2024 Feb 21;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13148-024-01639-5.
3
Single-Circulating Tumor Cell Whole Genome Amplification to Unravel Cancer Heterogeneity and Actionable Biomarkers.

本文引用的文献

1
Workflow optimization of whole genome amplification and targeted panel sequencing for CTC mutation detection.用于循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)突变检测的全基因组扩增和靶向测序面板的工作流程优化
NPJ Genom Med. 2017 Nov 1;2:34. doi: 10.1038/s41525-017-0034-3. eCollection 2017.
2
The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017.《国际不孕不育和生育保健词汇表》,2017 年。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1786-1801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex234.
3
Comparative study of whole genome amplification and next generation sequencing performance of single cancer cells.
单循环肿瘤细胞全基因组扩增以揭示癌症异质性和可行的生物标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 29;23(15):8386. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158386.
4
Single-cell DNA and RNA sequencing of circulating tumor cells.循环肿瘤细胞的单细胞 DNA 和 RNA 测序。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 24;11(1):22864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02165-7.
5
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders.胚胎植入前遗传学检测用于单基因疾病。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;11(8):871. doi: 10.3390/genes11080871.
6
Genomic Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells at the Single-Cell Level.单细胞水平循环肿瘤细胞的基因组分析。
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Jun;22(6):770-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
7
Clinical utility in infants with suspected monogenic conditions through next-generation sequencing.通过下一代测序技术对疑似单基因疾病的婴儿进行临床评估。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Jun;7(6):e684. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.684. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
单个癌细胞的全基因组扩增与下一代测序性能的比较研究。
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;8(34):56066-56080. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10701. eCollection 2017 Aug 22.
4
Performance of four modern whole genome amplification methods for copy number variant detection in single cells.四种现代全基因组扩增方法在单细胞拷贝数变异检测中的性能比较。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03711-y.
5
Comparison of whole genome amplification techniques for human single cell exome sequencing.用于人类单细胞外显子组测序的全基因组扩增技术比较
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171566. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparison of three whole genome amplification methods for detection of genomic aberrations in single cells.三种全基因组扩增方法用于检测单细胞基因组畸变的比较。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Sep;36(9):823-30. doi: 10.1002/pd.4866. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
7
Next Generation Sequencing Approach in a Prenatal Case of Cardio-Facio-Cutaneus Syndrome.下一代测序方法在一例心脏-面部-皮肤综合征产前病例中的应用
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jun 16;17(6):952. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060952.
8
Mutational analysis of single circulating tumor cells by next generation sequencing in metastatic breast cancer.通过下一代测序对转移性乳腺癌中的单个循环肿瘤细胞进行突变分析。
Oncotarget. 2016 May 3;7(18):26107-19. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8431.
9
Shallow whole genome sequencing is well suited for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in human blastocysts.浅层全基因组测序非常适合检测人类囊胚中的染色体畸变。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1276-85.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1144. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Comparative study of aCGH and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for chromosomal microdeletion and microduplication screening.比较基因组杂交(aCGH)与新一代测序(NGS)用于染色体微缺失和微重复筛查的比较研究。
J Prenat Med. 2014 Apr-Jun;8(3-4):57-69.