School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, United Kingdom.
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; VA Portland Health Care Service, Portland, Oregon.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Oct;99(10):2022-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
This study evaluated the relationship between physiological and perceived fall risk in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Secondary analysis of data from prospective cohort studies undertaken in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Community.
Ambulatory people with MS (N=416) (age 51.5±12.0 years; 73% female; 62% relapsing-remitting MS; 13.7±9.9 years disease duration).
Not applicable.
All participants completed measures of physiological (Physiological Profile Assessment [PPA]) and perceived (Falls Efficacy Scale-international [FESi]) fall risk and prospectively recorded falls for 3 months.
155 (37%) of the participants were recurrent fallers (≥2 falls). Mean PPA and FESi scores were high (PPA 2.14±1.87, FESi 34.27±11.18). The PPA and the FESi independently predicted faller classification in logistic regression, which indicated that the odds of being classified as a recurrent faller significantly increased with increasing scores (PPA odds ratio [OR] 1.30 [95% CI 1.17-1.46], FESi OR 1.05 [95% CI 1.03-1.07]). Classification and regression tree analysis divided the sample into four groups based on cutoff values for the PPA: (1) low physiological/low perceived risk (PPA <2.83, FESi <27.5), (2) low physiological/high perceived risk (PPA <2.83, FESi >27.5), (3) high physiological/low perceived risk (PPA >2.83, FESi <35.5), and (4) high physiological/high perceived risk (PPA <2.83, FESi >35.5). Over 50% of participants had a disparity between perceived and physiological fall risk; most were in group 2. It is possible that physiological risk factors not detected by the PPA may also be influential.
This study highlights the importance of considering both physiological and perceived fall risk in MS and the need for further research to explore the complex interrelationships of perceptual and physiological risk factors in this population. This study also supports the importance of developing behavioral and physical interventions that can be tailored to the individual's needs.
本研究评估了多发性硬化症(MS)患者生理和感知跌倒风险之间的关系。
在澳大利亚、英国和美国进行的前瞻性队列研究的数据的二次分析。
社区。
活动能力的多发性硬化症患者(N=416)(年龄 51.5±12.0 岁;73%为女性;62%为复发缓解型 MS;疾病病程 13.7±9.9 年)。
不适用。
所有参与者均完成生理(生理概况评估 [PPA])和感知(跌倒效能量表-国际版 [FESi])跌倒风险的测量,并在 3 个月内前瞻性记录跌倒情况。
155 名(37%)参与者为复发性跌倒者(≥2 次跌倒)。PPA 和 FESi 的平均得分较高(PPA 2.14±1.87,FESi 34.27±11.18)。PPA 和 FESi 在逻辑回归中独立预测跌倒者分类,表明随着得分的增加,被归类为复发性跌倒者的可能性显著增加(PPA 比值比 [OR] 1.30 [95%CI 1.17-1.46],FESi OR 1.05 [95%CI 1.03-1.07])。分类回归树分析根据 PPA 的截断值将样本分为四组:(1)低生理/低感知风险(PPA <2.83,FESi <27.5),(2)低生理/高感知风险(PPA <2.83,FESi >27.5),(3)高生理/低感知风险(PPA >2.83,FESi <35.5),和(4)高生理/高感知风险(PPA <2.83,FESi >35.5)。超过 50%的参与者感知和生理跌倒风险存在差异;大多数属于第 2 组。可能还有一些 PPA 未检测到的生理危险因素也会产生影响。
本研究强调了在多发性硬化症中考虑生理和感知跌倒风险的重要性,需要进一步研究以探索该人群中感知和生理风险因素的复杂相互关系。本研究还支持开发可根据个人需求定制的行为和身体干预措施的重要性。