Henkel Ralf, MAAß Gesa, Bödeker Rolf-Hasso, Scheibelhut Christine, Stalf Thomas, Mehnert Claas, Schuppe Hans-Christian, Jung Andreas, Schill Wolf-Bernhard
Department of Urology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena.
Center for Dermatology and Andrology.
Reprod Med Biol. 2005 Mar 7;4(1):7-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2005.00087.x. eCollection 2005 Mar.
The evaluation of different functional sperm parameters has become a tool in andrological diagnosis. These assays determine the sperm's capability to fertilize an oocyte. It also appears that sperm functions and semen parameters are interrelated and interdependent. Therefore, the question arose whether a given laboratory test or a battery of tests can predict the outcome in fertilization (IVF). One-hundred and sixty-one patients who underwent an IVF treatment were selected from a database of 4178 patients who had been examined for male infertility 3 months before or after IVF. Sperm concentration, motility, acrosin activity, acrosome reaction, sperm morphology, maternal age, number of transferred embryos, embryo score, fertilization rate and pregnancy rate were determined. In addition, logistic regression models to describe fertilization rate and pregnancy were developed. All the parameters in the models were dichotomized and intra- and interindividual variability of the parameters were assessed. Although the sperm parameters showed good correlations with IVF when correlated separately, the only essential parameter in the multivariate model was morphology. The enormous intra- and interindividual variability of the values was striking. In conclusion, our data indicate that the andrological status at the end of the respective treatment does not necessarily represent the status at the time of IVF. Despite a relatively low correlation coefficient in the logistic regression model, it appears that among the parameters tested, the most reliable parameter to predict fertilization is normal sperm morphology. (Reprod Med Biol 2005; 4: 7-30).
对不同功能性精子参数的评估已成为男科诊断的一项工具。这些检测可确定精子使卵母细胞受精的能力。精子功能和精液参数似乎也是相互关联且相互依存的。因此,就出现了这样一个问题:某一项实验室检测或一系列检测能否预测体外受精(IVF)的结果。从一个包含4178名患者的数据库中选取了161名接受IVF治疗的患者,这些患者在IVF前后3个月接受过男性不育检查。测定了精子浓度、活力、顶体蛋白酶活性、顶体反应、精子形态、产妇年龄、移植胚胎数量、胚胎评分、受精率和妊娠率。此外,还建立了描述受精率和妊娠情况的逻辑回归模型。模型中的所有参数都进行了二分法处理,并评估了参数的个体内和个体间变异性。尽管单独分析时精子参数与IVF显示出良好的相关性,但多变量模型中唯一重要的参数是形态。这些数值在个体内和个体间的巨大变异性令人瞩目。总之,我们的数据表明,各自治疗结束时的男科状况不一定代表IVF时的状况。尽管逻辑回归模型中的相关系数相对较低,但在所检测的参数中,预测受精最可靠的参数似乎是正常精子形态。(《生殖医学与生物学》2005年;4:7 - 30)