Fors Brandebo Maria, Österberg Johan, Berglund Anna Karin
Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership, Swedish National Defence College, Karlstad, Sweden.
Psychol Rep. 2019 Jun;122(3):1068-1086. doi: 10.1177/0033294118771542. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether constructive or destructive leadership behaviors are the best predictors of soldiers' experienced meaningfulness of work and general job satisfaction. Data were collected among 300 employed soldiers using a questionnaire. The questionnaire contained questions about the immediate leader's constructive and destructive leadership, meaningfulness of work and general job satisfaction. The results show that the constructive leadership factor inspiration and motivation was the best predictor of both experienced meaningfulness of work and general job satisfaction. None of the destructive leadership factors gave a significant contribution to the models although both the passive and active forms of destructive leadership showed a weak to moderate significant, negative correlation with experienced meaningfulness of work and general job satisfaction.
本研究的目的是调查建设性或破坏性领导行为是否是士兵工作意义体验和总体工作满意度的最佳预测指标。通过问卷调查收集了300名在职士兵的数据。问卷包含有关直属领导的建设性和破坏性领导、工作意义和总体工作满意度的问题。结果表明,建设性领导因素激励和动机是工作意义体验和总体工作满意度的最佳预测指标。尽管破坏性领导的被动和主动形式与工作意义体验和总体工作满意度均呈现出弱至中度的显著负相关,但没有一个破坏性领导因素对模型有显著贡献。