Suppr超能文献

缓解期体细胞突变清除与急性髓系白血病复发风险

Clearance of Somatic Mutations at Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

机构信息

Kiyomi Morita, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Feng Wang, Yuanqing Yan, Carlos Bueso-Ramos, Koji Sasaki, Ghayas C. Issa, Sa Wang, Jeffrey Jorgensen, Xingzhi Song, Jianhua Zhang, Samantha Tippen, Rebecca Thornton, Marcus Coyle, Latasha Little, Curtis Gumbs, Naveen Pemmaraju, Naval Daver, Courtney D. DiNardo, Marina Konopleva, Michael Andreeff, Farhad Ravandi, Jorge E. Cortes, Tapan Kadia, Elias Jabbour, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Keyur P. Patel, P. Andrew Futreal, and Koichi Takahash, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kiyomi Morita, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo; and Koichi Takahashi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 20;36(18):1788-1797. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6757. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the current study was to determine whether the degree of mutation clearance at remission predicts the risk of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods One hundred thirty-one previously untreated patients with AML who received intensive induction chemotherapy and attained morphologic complete remission (CR) at day 30 were studied. Pretreatment and CR bone marrow were analyzed using targeted capture DNA sequencing. We analyzed the association between mutation clearance (MC) on the basis of variant allele frequency (VAF) at CR (MC2.5: if the VAF of residual mutations was < 2.5%; MC1.0: if the VAF was < 1%; and complete MC [CMC]: if no detectable residual mutations) and event-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Results MC1.0 and CMC were associated with significantly better OS (2-year OS: 75% v 61% in MC1.0 v non-MC1.0; P = .0465; 2-year OS: 77% v 60% in CMC v non-CMC; P = .0303) and lower CIR (2-year CIR: 26% v 46% in MC1.0 v non-MC 1.0; P = .0349; 2 year-CIR: 24% v 46% in CMC v non-CMC; P = .03), whereas there was no significant difference in any of the above outcomes by MC2.5. Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, cytogenetic risk, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease revealed that patients with CMC had significantly better event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; P = .0083), OS (HR, 0.47; P = .04), and CIR (HR, 0.27; P < .001) than did patients without CMC. These prognostic associations were stronger when preleukemic mutations, such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, were removed from the analysis. Conclusion Clearance of somatic mutation at CR, particularly in nonpreleukemic genes, was associated with significantly better survival and less risk of relapse. Somatic mutations in nonpreleukemic genes may function as a molecular minimal residual disease marker in AML.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定缓解时的突变清除程度是否可预测急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的复发风险。

方法

研究纳入 131 例先前未经治疗、接受强化诱导化疗并在第 30 天达到形态完全缓解(CR)的 AML 患者。采用靶向捕获 DNA 测序分析预处理和 CR 骨髓。我们分析了 CR 时基于变异等位基因频率(VAF)的突变清除(MC)与无事件生存、总生存(OS)和累积复发率(CIR)之间的关联。

结果

MC1.0 和 CMC 与显著更好的 OS(2 年 OS:MC1.0 组为 75%,非 MC1.0 组为 61%;P=0.0465;2 年 OS:CMC 组为 77%,非 CMC 组为 60%;P=0.0303)和更低的 CIR(2 年 CIR:MC1.0 组为 26%,非 MC1.0 组为 46%;P=0.0349;2 年 CIR:CMC 组为 24%,非 CMC 组为 46%;P=0.03)相关,而 MC2.5 无显著差异。多变量分析调整年龄、细胞遗传学风险、异基因造血干细胞移植和基于流式细胞术的微小残留病后发现,与无 CMC 的患者相比,有 CMC 的患者无事件生存(风险比 [HR],0.43;P=0.0083)、OS(HR,0.47;P=0.04)和 CIR(HR,0.27;P<0.001)更好。当从分析中去除白血病前突变(如 DNMT3A、TET2 和 ASXL1)时,这些预后相关性更强。

结论

CR 时的体细胞突变清除,特别是在非白血病前基因中,与更好的生存和更低的复发风险显著相关。非白血病前基因中的体细胞突变可能是 AML 中一种分子微小残留病的标志物。

相似文献

4

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Standard-Risk AML.标准风险 AML 中的微小残留病评估。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):422-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507471. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验