• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨主试对表现的记忆、领域分离和分数可变性之间的关系。

Exploring the relationship between examiners' memories for performances, domain separation and score variability.

机构信息

a Keele University School of Medicine , UK.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1159-1165. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1463088. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1463088
PMID:29703091
Abstract

OSCE examiners' scores are variable and may discriminate domains of performance poorly. Examiners must hold their observations of OSCE performances in "episodic memory" until performances end. We investigated whether examiners vary in their recollection of performances; and whether this relates to their score variability or ability to separate disparate performance domains. Secondary analysis was performed on data where examiners had: 1/scored videos of OSCE performances showing disparate student ability in different domains; and 2/performed a measure of recollection for an OSCE performance. We calculated measures of "overall-score variance" (the degree individual examiners' overall scores varied from the group mean) and "domain separation" (the degree to which examiners separated different performance domains). We related these variables to the measure of examiners' recollection. Examiners varied considerably in their recollection accuracy (recognition beyond chance -5% to +75% for different examiners). Examiners' recollection accuracy was weakly inversely related to their overall score accuracy ( = -0.17,  < 0.001) and related to their ability to separate domains of performance ( = 0.25,  < 0.001). Examiners vary substantially in their memories for students' performances which may offer a useful point of difference to study processing and integration phases of judgment. Findings could have implication for the utility of feedback.

摘要

客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)考官的评分存在差异,并且可能无法准确区分考生表现的不同领域。考官必须将对 OSCE 表现的观察结果暂存在“情景记忆”中,直到考试结束。我们研究了考官在回忆表现时是否存在差异;以及这种差异是否与他们的评分变异性或区分不同表现领域的能力有关。我们对以下数据进行了二次分析:1. 考官对 OSCE 表现进行评分,这些表现展示了不同考生在不同领域的不同能力;2. 考官对 OSCE 表现进行了回忆测试。我们计算了“总体评分方差”(个体考官的总体评分与群体平均值的差异程度)和“领域分离”(考官区分不同表现领域的程度)的指标。我们将这些变量与考官回忆的测试结果相关联。考官在回忆准确性方面存在较大差异(不同考官的识别准确率在 5%-75%之间)。考官的回忆准确性与他们的总体评分准确性呈弱负相关( = -0.17, < 0.001),并且与他们区分表现领域的能力相关( = 0.25, < 0.001)。考官对学生表现的记忆存在较大差异,这可能为研究判断的处理和整合阶段提供了一个有用的差异点。研究结果可能对反馈的有效性产生影响。

相似文献

1
Exploring the relationship between examiners' memories for performances, domain separation and score variability.探讨主试对表现的记忆、领域分离和分数可变性之间的关系。
Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1159-1165. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1463088. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
Inter-school variations in the standard of examiners' graduation-level OSCE judgements.考官对毕业水平客观结构化临床考试判断标准的校际差异。
Med Teach. 2025 Apr;47(4):735-743. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2372087. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Using cultural historical activity theory to reflect on the sociocultural complexities in OSCE examiners' judgements.运用文化历史活动理论反思客观结构化临床考试执考者判断中的社会性文化复杂性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;28(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10139-1. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
4
A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners' scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams.一项关于种族刻板印象偏差对本科临床考试中考官评分、反馈及记忆影响的随机试验。
BMC Med. 2017 Oct 25;15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0.
5
Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.开发一种基于视频的方法,以比较和调整完全嵌套 OSCE 中的考官效应。
Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):250-263. doi: 10.1111/medu.13783. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Investigating the accuracy of adjusting for examiner differences in multi-centre Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs). A simulation study of video-based Examiner Score Comparison and Adjustment (VESCA).研究在多中心客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中针对考官差异进行调整的准确性。一项基于视频的考官分数比较与调整(VESCA)模拟研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1466. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06462-3.
7
Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.主观性中的客观性:学生的自我评估和同伴评估与考官对临床技能的主观及客观评估相关吗?一项前瞻性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e012289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012289.
8
Measuring the Effect of Examiner Variability in a Multiple-Circuit Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).测量多站式客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中主考人变异性的效果。
Acad Med. 2021 Aug 1;96(8):1189-1196. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004028. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.标准化考生:开发一种新工具,以评估影响客观结构化临床考试分数的因素并培训考官。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001333. eCollection 2020.
10
MRCGP CSA: are the examiners biased, favouring their own by sex, ethnicity, and degree source?MRCGP CSA:考官是否存在偏见,偏向于自己的性别、种族和学位来源?
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e718-25. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X674396.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring assessor cognition as a source of score variability in a performance assessment of practice-based competencies.探讨评估者认知作为基于实践能力表现评估中评分变异性的一个来源。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 25;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02077-6.
2
Optimizing assessors' mental workload in rater-based assessment: a critical narrative review.基于评估者的评分评估中评估者心理工作量的优化:批判性叙事评论。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Dec;8(6):339-345. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-00535-6.