Suppr超能文献

心脏手术中的一氧化氮:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Nitric Oxide in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Sardo Salvatore, Osawa Eduardo Atsushi, Finco Gabriele, Gomes Galas Filomena Regina Barbosa, de Almeida Juliano Pinheiro, Cutuli Salvatore Lucio, Frassanito Claudia, Landoni Giovanni, Hajjar Ludhmila Abrahao

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.

Intensive Care Unit, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Dec;32(6):2512-2519. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of perioperative administration of nitric oxide in cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac surgery patients.

INTERVENTIONS

A search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and MEDLINE for RCTs that compared nitric oxide with placebo or other comparators.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and secondary outcomes were mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and reduction of mean pulmonary artery pressure. The study included 18 RCTs comprising 958 patients. The authors calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with random-effects model. Quantitative synthesis of data demonstrated a clinically negligible reduction in the length of ICU stay (MD -0.38 days, confidence interval CI [-0.65 to -0.11]; p = 0.005) and mechanical ventilation duration (MD -4.81 hours, CI [-7.79 to -1.83]; p = 0.002) compared with all control interventions with no benefit on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative delivery of inhaled nitric oxide resulted to be of no or minimal benefit in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing cardiac surgery. Large, randomized trials are needed to further assess its effect on major clinical outcomes and its cost-effectiveness.

摘要

目的

探讨心脏手术围手术期应用一氧化氮的疗效和安全性。

设计

随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

研究对象

心脏手术患者。

干预措施

检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、Embase和MEDLINE,查找比较一氧化氮与安慰剂或其他对照物的随机对照试验。

测量指标及主要结果

主要结局指标为重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间,次要结局指标为死亡率、机械通气时间及平均肺动脉压降低情况。该研究纳入了18项随机对照试验,共958例患者。作者采用随机效应模型计算合并比值比(OR)和平均差(MD)。数据的定量综合分析表明,与所有对照干预措施相比,ICU住院时间(MD -0.38天,置信区间CI [-0.65至-0.11];p = 0.005)和机械通气时间(MD -4.81小时,CI [-7.79至-1.83];p = 0.002)在临床上有可忽略不计的缩短,但对死亡率无益处。

结论

对于接受心脏手术的肺动脉高压患者,围手术期吸入一氧化氮没有或仅有极小的益处。需要进行大型随机试验以进一步评估其对主要临床结局的影响及其成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验