• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景与临床推理:理解医学生的视角。

Context and clinical reasoning : Understanding the medical student perspective.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School Of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, at Naval Medical Centre San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Centre at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Aug;7(4):256-263. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0417-x.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-018-0417-x
PMID:29704167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6086813/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown that a physician's clinical reasoning performance can be influenced by contextual factors. We explored how the clinical reasoning performance of medical students was impacted by contextual factors in order to expand upon previous findings in resident and board certified physicians. Using situated cognition as the theoretical framework, our aim was to evaluate the verbalized clinical reasoning processes of medical students in order to describe what impact the presence of contextual factors has on their reasoning performance.

METHODS

Seventeen medical student participants viewed three video recordings of clinical encounters portraying straightforward diagnostic cases in internal medicine with explicit contextual factors inserted. Participants completed a computerized post-encounter form as well as a think-aloud protocol. Three authors analyzed verbatim transcripts from the think-aloud protocols using a constant comparative approach. After iterative coding, utterances were analyzed and grouped into categories and themes.

RESULTS

Six categories and ten associated themes emerged, which demonstrated overlap with findings from previous studies in resident and attending physicians. Four overlapping categories included emotional disturbances, behavioural inferences about the patient, doctor-patient relationship, and difficulty with closure. Two new categories emerged to include anchoring and misinterpretation of data.

DISCUSSION

The presence of contextual factors appeared to impact clinical reasoning performance in medical students. The data suggest that a contextual factor can be innate to the clinical scenario, consistent with situated cognition theory. These findings build upon our understanding of clinical reasoning performance from both a theoretical and practical perspective.

摘要

简介

研究表明,医生的临床推理表现可能受到情境因素的影响。我们探讨了医学生的临床推理表现如何受到情境因素的影响,以扩展之前在住院医师和认证医师中的发现。本研究以情境认知为理论框架,旨在评估医学生的口头临床推理过程,以描述情境因素对他们推理表现的影响。

方法

17 名医学生参与者观看了三段内科临床接触录像,录像中呈现了带有明确情境因素的简单诊断案例。参与者完成了计算机化的接触后表格以及出声思维协议。三位作者使用恒定比较法分析出声思维协议的逐字记录。经过迭代编码,对表述进行了分析,并将其分为类别和主题。

结果

出现了六个类别和十个相关主题,这些主题与住院医师和主治医生的先前研究结果重叠。四个重叠类别包括情绪障碍、对患者的行为推断、医患关系以及难以结案。两个新类别包括锚定和对数据的误解。

讨论

情境因素的存在似乎影响了医学生的临床推理表现。数据表明,情境因素可能是临床情景固有的,与情境认知理论一致。这些发现从理论和实践两个角度加深了我们对临床推理表现的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbc/6086813/630f151c0d65/40037_2018_417_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbc/6086813/630f151c0d65/40037_2018_417_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbc/6086813/630f151c0d65/40037_2018_417_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Context and clinical reasoning : Understanding the medical student perspective.背景与临床推理:理解医学生的视角。
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Aug;7(4):256-263. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0417-x.
2
Consequences of contextual factors on clinical reasoning in resident physicians.情境因素对住院医师临床推理的影响
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 Dec;20(5):1225-36. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9597-x. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
3
Contextual factors and clinical reasoning: differences in diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning in board certified versus resident physicians.情境因素与临床推理:获得委员会认证的医生与住院医师在诊断和治疗推理方面的差异。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1041-x.
4
Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert's voice.背景与临床推理:理解专家观点的视角。
Med Educ. 2011 Sep;45(9):927-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04053.x.
5
Use of clinical reasoning tasks by medical students.医学生对临床推理任务的运用。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Jun 26;6(2):127-135. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0077.
6
The impact of selected contextual factors on experts' clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?).所选情境因素对专家临床推理表现的影响(情境是否会影响专家的临床推理表现?)
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):65-79. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9294-3. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
7
Clinical Reasoning Tasks and Resident Physicians: What Do They Reason About?临床推理任务与住院医师:他们在推理什么?
Acad Med. 2016 Jul;91(7):1022-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001024.
8
Observable phenomena that reveal medical students' clinical reasoning ability during expert assessment of their history taking: a qualitative study.可观察现象揭示医学生在专家评估病史采集时的临床推理能力:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0983-3.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Gathering Validity Evidence on an Internal Medicine Clerkship Multistep Exam to Assess Medical Student Analytic Ability.收集关于内科实习多步骤考试的效度证据以评估医学生的分析能力。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1749635. Epub 2020 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Gender Perspectives in Medical Education: Latent Semantic Analysis of Israeli First-Year Medical Students' Reflections.探索医学教育中的性别视角:对以色列一年级医学生反思的潜在语义分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Aug 29;11:e78371. doi: 10.2196/78371.
2
Facilitating clinical reasoning for medical students in clinical settings: a scoping review.促进医学生在临床环境中的临床推理:一项范围综述
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Jun;37(2):163-186. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.333. Epub 2025 May 29.
3
Concept mapping to promote clinical reasoning in multimorbidity: a mixed methods study in undergraduate family medicine.概念图促进多重疾病临床推理:一项本科家庭医学的混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1478. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06484-x.
4
Physicians have feelings: illuminating the relationship between emotional valence, clinical reasoning and context specificity.医生有情感:阐明情感效价、临床推理和情境特异性之间的关系。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2404299. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2404299. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
5
Exploring context and culture in clinical reasoning medical education: A qualitative exploratory study.探索临床推理医学教育中的背景与文化:一项质性探索性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e14126. doi: 10.1111/jep.14126. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
6
Effect evaluation of case-based learning with situated cognition theory on competence training for student nurses in pediatric surgery.基于情境认知理论的案例教学法对小儿外科实习护生能力培养的效果评价
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):e13427. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13427. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Clinical reasoning pattern used in oral health problem solving - A case study in Indonesian undergraduate dental students.临床推理模式在口腔健康问题解决中的应用——印度尼西亚本科牙科学生的案例研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03808-7.
8
Physicians' Experiences and Perceptions of Environmental Factors Affecting Their Practices of Continuous Deep Sedation until Death: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis of an Interview Study.医生对影响其持续深度镇静直至死亡实践的环境因素的经验和看法:对访谈研究的二次定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095472.
9
Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Psychiatry: Concepts, Processes, and Pitfalls.法医精神病学中的临床推理:概念、过程与陷阱
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 5;12:691377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.691377. eCollection 2021.
10
Contextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation.临床吞咽评估中的临床推理语境化:范围综述和专家咨询。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2021 Jul 29;68(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.832.