Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):90-97.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.039. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastrointestinal bleeding results in significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in the United States. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' payment reform programs assess quality and value based on rates of hospital readmission for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, but they identify these patients using Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs), which include many types of gastrointestinal bleeding and do not account for the clinical heterogeneity among these patients. We aimed to characterize heterogeneity in outcomes of subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.
We performed was a cross-sectional, claims-based retrospective analysis of Medicare fee for service beneficiaries hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding in 2014 (159,000 hospitalizations). The primary outcome was unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge from the hospital (30-day readmission). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, inpatient mortality, and death within 30 days of admission to the hospital (30-day mortality). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, and Elixhauser comorbidities using logistic and Poisson regression, adjusting for clustering within hospitals.
The 30-day readmission rate was 16.0%. Readmission rates varied among patients with different types of gastrointestinal bleeding, ranging from 13.5% for diverticular bleeding to 18.6% for small bowel bleeding. The mean length of stay was 4.2 days and 30-day mortality was 6.9% (ranging from 3.4% for diverticular bleeding to 12.1% for upper gastrointestinal bleeding not otherwise specified). When hospitalizations were stratified by MS-DRGs, the main source of variation in rates of readmission and mortality was MS-DRGs.
In a retrospective analysis of Medicare fee for service beneficiaries hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding, we found that 16% of these patients are readmitted to the hospital. Rates of hospital readmission, length of stay, and mortality vary with type of gastrointestinal bleeding, but MS-DRGs account for the largest source of variation. Policies focused on quality and value should account for this heterogeneity.
在美国,胃肠道出血会导致较高的发病率、死亡率和医疗保健费用。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的支付改革计划根据胃肠道出血患者的住院再入院率来评估质量和价值,但他们使用医疗保险严重程度诊断相关组(MS-DRGs)来识别这些患者,其中包括许多类型的胃肠道出血,且没有考虑到这些患者之间的临床异质性。我们旨在描述胃肠道出血患者亚组结局的异质性。
我们进行了一项基于医疗保险按服务收费受益人的回顾性横断面分析,纳入了 2014 年因胃肠道出血住院的患者(159000 例住院患者)。主要结局是出院后 30 天内非计划性再入院(30 天再入院率)。次要结局包括住院时间、住院内死亡率和入院后 30 天内死亡率。使用逻辑回归和泊松回归,调整年龄、性别、种族和 Elixhauser 合并症,同时调整医院内的聚类。
30 天再入院率为 16.0%。不同类型胃肠道出血患者的再入院率不同,从憩室出血的 13.5%到小肠出血的 18.6%不等。平均住院时间为 4.2 天,30 天死亡率为 6.9%(从憩室出血的 3.4%到未特指的上消化道出血的 12.1%不等)。当按 MS-DRGs 对住院进行分层时,再入院率和死亡率的主要变异来源是 MS-DRGs。
在对医疗保险按服务收费受益人的胃肠道出血住院患者进行的回顾性分析中,我们发现其中 16%的患者会再次住院。住院再入院率、住院时间和死亡率因胃肠道出血类型而异,但 MS-DRGs 是最大的变异来源。关注质量和价值的政策应该考虑到这种异质性。