Department of Social Policy & Social Work, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 May;31:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
A large randomised controlled trial found that the provision of either Alexander Technique lessons or acupuncture, for those with chronic neck pain, resulted in significantly increased self-efficacy when compared with usual care alone. In turn, enhanced self-efficacy was associated with significant reductions in neck pain at 6 and 12 months. In this analysis we explore the perspectives of participants within the trial, with the aim of gaining a better understanding of how these interventions had an impact.
We used a longitudinal qualitative approach; in-depth interviews, informed by a topic guide, were conducted with a sample of the trial population. Participants were interviewed twice: at around six months (n = 30) and twelve months (n = 26) after trial entry. Analysis was guided by the principles of grounded theory, and key themes were developed.
Five key themes emerged: pre-trial experiences of biomedical treatment against which subsequent interventions were compared; emergence of tangible benefits from the interventions; factors that contributed to the observed benefits, notably growing self-care and self-efficacy; a developing sense of embodiment as an integral part of the transformative process; and contribution of these factors to sustaining benefits over the longer term.
In-depth interviews revealed a rich array of experiences. They gave insight into the positive impact of the interventions on development of self-care, self-efficacy and embodiment. These findings complement the quantitative trial data, providing a more nuanced understanding of the factors that underpin the previously quantified improvement in self-efficacy and its association with longer-term reductions in pain.
一项大型随机对照试验发现,与单纯常规护理相比,为慢性颈痛患者提供亚历山大技术课程或针灸治疗,可显著提高自我效能感。反过来,自我效能感的增强与 6 个月和 12 个月时颈痛的显著减轻相关。在本分析中,我们探讨了试验参与者的观点,旨在更好地了解这些干预措施如何产生影响。
我们采用了纵向定性方法;根据主题指南,对试验人群的样本进行了深入访谈。参与者在试验入组后 6 个月(n=30)和 12 个月(n=26)时接受了两次访谈。分析受扎根理论原则的指导,并开发了主要主题。
出现了五个关键主题:与后续干预措施进行比较的生物医学治疗前的经验;干预措施产生了明显的益处;促成观察到的益处的因素,特别是自我护理和自我效能感的增强;作为转变过程不可或缺的一部分,对身体的认识逐渐增强;以及这些因素对长期维持益处的贡献。
深入访谈揭示了丰富的经验。它们深入了解了干预措施对自我护理、自我效能感和身体认识发展的积极影响。这些发现补充了定量试验数据,更细致地理解了支撑先前量化的自我效能感改善及其与长期疼痛减轻相关的因素。