MacPherson H, Vertosick E A, Foster N E, Lewith G, Linde K, Sherman K J, Witt C M, Vickers A J
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Pain. 2017 May;158(5):784-793. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000747.
There is uncertainty regarding how long the effects of acupuncture treatment persist after a course of treatment. We aimed to determine the trajectory of pain scores over time after acupuncture, using a large individual patient data set from high-quality randomized trials of acupuncture for chronic pain. The available individual patient data set included 29 trials and 17,922 patients. The chronic pain conditions included musculoskeletal pain (low back, neck, and shoulder), osteoarthritis of the knee, and headache/migraine. We used meta-analytic techniques to determine the trajectory of posttreatment pain scores. Data on longer term follow-up were available for 20 trials, including 6376 patients. In trials comparing acupuncture to no acupuncture control (wait-list, usual care, etc), effect sizes diminished by a nonsignificant 0.011 SD per 3 months (95% confidence interval: -0.014 to 0.037, P = 0.4) after treatment ended. The central estimate suggests that approximately 90% of the benefit of acupuncture relative to controls would be sustained at 12 months. For trials comparing acupuncture to sham, we observed a reduction in effect size of 0.025 SD per 3 months (95% confidence interval: 0.000-0.050, P = 0.050), suggesting approximately a 50% diminution at 12 months. The effects of a course of acupuncture treatment for patients with chronic pain do not seem to decrease importantly over 12 months. Patients can generally be reassured that treatment effects persist. Studies of the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture should take our findings into account when considering the time horizon of acupuncture effects. Further research should measure longer term outcomes of acupuncture.
关于针灸治疗一个疗程后其效果能持续多久存在不确定性。我们旨在利用来自高质量针灸治疗慢性疼痛随机试验的大型个体患者数据集,确定针灸后疼痛评分随时间的变化轨迹。现有的个体患者数据集包括29项试验和17922名患者。慢性疼痛病症包括肌肉骨骼疼痛(腰、颈和肩)、膝关节骨关节炎以及头痛/偏头痛。我们使用荟萃分析技术来确定治疗后疼痛评分的变化轨迹。有20项试验提供了长期随访数据,包括6376名患者。在将针灸与无针灸对照(等待名单、常规护理等)进行比较的试验中,治疗结束后,效应量每3个月以不显著的0.011标准差下降(95%置信区间:-0.014至0.037,P = 0.4)。中心估计表明,相对于对照组,针灸约90%的益处将在12个月时持续存在。对于将针灸与假针灸进行比较的试验,我们观察到效应量每3个月下降0.025标准差(95%置信区间:0.000 - 0.050,P = 0.050),这表明在12个月时约下降50%。对于慢性疼痛患者,一个疗程的针灸治疗效果在12个月内似乎不会显著下降。患者通常可以放心,治疗效果会持续。针灸成本效益研究在考虑针灸效果的时间范围时应考虑我们的研究结果。进一步的研究应测量针灸的长期结果。