• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪波动影响决策的合理性:元认知障碍的证据。

Emotional see-saw affects rationality of decision-making: Evidence for metacognitive impairments.

作者信息

Folwarczny Michał, Kaczmarek Magdalena C, Doliński Dariusz, Szczepanowski Remigiusz

机构信息

SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Psychology in Wrocław, Poland.

Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of the Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.012
PMID:29706201
Abstract

This research investigated the cognitive mechanisms that underlie impairments in human reasoning triggered by the emotional see-saw technique. It has previously been stated that such manipulation is effective as it presumably induces a mindless state and cognitive deficits in compliant individuals. Based on the dual-system architecture of reasoning (system 2) and affective decision-making (system 1), we challenged the previous theoretical account by indicating that the main source of compliance is impairment of the meta-reasoning system when rapid affective changes occur. To examine this hypothesis, we manipulated affective feelings (system 1 processing) by violating participants' expectations regarding reward and performance in a go/no-go task in which individuals were to inhibit their responses to earn money. Aside from the go/no-go performance, we measured rationality (meta-reasoning system 2) in decision-making by asking participants to comply with a nonsensical request. We found that participants who were exposed to meta-reasoning impairments due to the emotional see-saw phenomenon exhibited mindless behavior.

摘要

本研究调查了由情绪跷跷板技术引发的人类推理障碍背后的认知机制。此前曾指出,这种操纵是有效的,因为它可能会在顺从的个体中诱发一种无意识状态和认知缺陷。基于推理(系统2)和情感决策(系统1)的双系统架构,我们对之前的理论解释提出了质疑,指出当快速的情感变化发生时,顺从的主要来源是元推理系统的损伤。为了检验这一假设,我们通过在一个“是/否”任务中违反参与者对奖励和表现的预期来操纵情感感受(系统1加工),在该任务中,个体需要抑制自己的反应以赚取金钱。除了“是/否”任务的表现,我们还通过要求参与者遵守一个荒谬的请求来测量决策中的理性(元推理系统2)。我们发现,由于情绪跷跷板现象而受到元推理损伤的参与者表现出无意识行为。

相似文献

1
Emotional see-saw affects rationality of decision-making: Evidence for metacognitive impairments.情绪波动影响决策的合理性:元认知障碍的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.确信即确信:前额叶振荡支持决策的元认知监控。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):781-789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1612-16.2016.
3
Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study.元认知能力与自信感的神经关联:一项大规模功能磁共振成像研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1942-1951. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw093. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
A neural network reflecting individual differences in cognitive processing of emotions during perceptual decision making.一个反映在知觉决策过程中情绪认知加工个体差异的神经网络。
Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 15;33(3):1016-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.031. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
5
Response generation, not response execution, influences feelings of rightness in reasoning.反应生成而非反应执行,会影响推理中的正确感。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2379-2389. doi: 10.1177/17470218231156712. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
6
[Characteristics and impact of metacognitive deficits in schizophrenia].[精神分裂症元认知缺陷的特征及影响]
Encephale. 2013 Apr;39(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
7
Influence of affective significance on different levels of processing using pupil dilation in an analogical reasoning task.情感意义对类比推理任务中不同水平加工的影响:瞳孔扩张的作用。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Feb;79(2):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
8
[A quasi-experimental study on the decisions, behavioral regulation, and metacognition of Ecuadorian men].[一项关于厄瓜多尔男性决策、行为调节和元认知的准实验研究]
Medwave. 2020 Apr 20;20(3):e7855. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2020.03.7855.
9
Metacognition and emotional regulation in children from 8 to 12 years old.儿童 8 至 12 岁的元认知和情绪调节。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Jun;90 Suppl 1:1-16. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12305. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
10
Neural systems mediating decision-making and response inhibition for social and nonsocial stimuli in autism.介导自闭症中社交和非社交刺激的决策与反应抑制的神经系统。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 3;60:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 10.