Shafritz Keith M, Bregman Joel D, Ikuta Toshikazu, Szeszko Philip R
Department of Psychology, 135 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, United States; Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-LIJ Health System, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, United States.
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-LIJ Health System, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, United States; The Center for Autism, 3905 Ford Road, Philadelphia, PA 19131, United States.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 3;60:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Autism is marked by impairments in social reciprocity and communication, along with restricted, repetitive and stereotyped behaviors. Prior studies have separately investigated social processing and executive function in autism, but little is known about the brain mechanisms of cognitive control for both emotional and nonemotional stimuli. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify differences in neurocircuitry between individuals with high functioning autism (HFA) and neurotypical controls during two versions of a go/no-go task: emotional (fear and happy faces) and nonemotional (English letters). During the letter task, HFA participants showed hypoactivation in the ventral prefrontal cortex. During the emotion task, happy faces elicited activation in the ventral striatum, nucleus accumbens and anterior amygdala in neurotypical, but not HFA, participants. Response inhibition for fear faces compared with happy faces recruited occipitotemporal regions in HFA, but not neurotypical, participants. In a direct contrast of emotional no-go and letter no-go blocks, HFA participants showed hyperactivation in extrastriate cortex and fusiform gyrus. Accuracy for emotional no-go trials was negatively correlated with activation in fusiform gyrus in the HFA group. These results indicate that autism is associated with abnormal processing in socioemotional brain networks, and support the theory that autism is marked by a social motivational deficit.
自闭症的特征是社交互动和沟通受损,以及存在局限、重复和刻板的行为。先前的研究分别调查了自闭症患者的社会认知加工和执行功能,但对于情绪和非情绪刺激的认知控制的大脑机制却知之甚少。我们使用功能磁共振成像来确定高功能自闭症(HFA)个体与正常对照组在两种版本的停止信号任务(Go/No-Go任务)中的神经回路差异:情绪性任务(恐惧和快乐面孔)和非情绪性任务(英文字母)。在字母任务中,HFA参与者腹侧前额叶皮层激活不足。在情绪任务中,快乐面孔在正常对照组参与者的腹侧纹状体、伏隔核和杏仁核前部引起激活,但在HFA参与者中未出现这种情况。与快乐面孔相比,HFA参与者对恐惧面孔的反应抑制激活了枕颞区,但正常对照组参与者未出现这种情况。在情绪停止信号块和字母停止信号块的直接对比中,HFA参与者在纹外皮层和梭状回中表现出激活增强。HFA组中情绪停止信号试验的准确性与梭状回中的激活呈负相关。这些结果表明,自闭症与社会情绪脑网络的异常加工有关,并支持自闭症以社会动机缺陷为特征的理论。