Suppr超能文献

生物炭与粪肥共堆肥是改善土壤健康和减少一氧化氮排放的更好解决方案吗?

Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and NO emissions mitigation?

作者信息

Yuan Yinghong, Chen Huaihai, Yuan Wenqiao, Williams David, Walker John T, Shi Wei

机构信息

Institute of Ecology and Environmental Science, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China.

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

出版信息

Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;113:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.025.

Abstract

Land application of compost has been a promising remediation strategy for soil health and environmental quality, but substantial emissions of greenhouse gases, especially NO, need to be controlled during making and using compost of high N-load wastes, such as chicken manure. Biochar as a bulking agent for composting has been proposed as a novel approach to solve this issue, due to large surface area and porosity, and thus high ion exchange and adsorption capacity. Here, we compared the impacts of biochar-chicken manure co-compost (BM) and chicken manure compost (M) on soil biological properties and processes in a 120-d microcosm experiment at the soil moisture of 60% water-filled pore space. Our results showed that BM and M addition significantly enhanced soil total C and N, inorganic and KCl-extractable organic N, microbial biomass C and N, cellulase enzyme activity, abundance of NO-producing bacteria and fungi, and gas emissions of NO and CO. However, compared to the M treatment, BM significantly reduced soil CO and NO emissions by 35% and 27%, respectively, over the experimental period. The N-NO site preference, i.e., difference between N-NO in the center position (δN) and the end position (δN), was ~17‰ for M and ~26‰ for BM during the first week of incubation, suggesting that BM suppressed NO from bacterial denitrification and/or nitrifier denitrification. This inference was well aligned with the observation that soil glucosaminidase activity and gene abundance were lower in BM than M treatment. Further, soil peroxidase activity was greater in BM than M treatment, implying soil organic C was more stable in BM treatment. Our data demonstrated that the biochar-chicken manure co-compost could substantially reduce soil NO emissions compared to chicken manure compost, via controls on soil organic C stabilization and the activities of microbial functional groups, especially bacterial denitrifiers.

摘要

堆肥的土地施用一直是改善土壤健康和环境质量的一种很有前景的修复策略,但是在制作和使用高氮负荷废物(如鸡粪)堆肥的过程中,需要控制大量温室气体的排放,尤其是一氧化氮(NO)。生物炭作为堆肥的填充剂,由于其具有较大的表面积和孔隙率,因而具有较高的离子交换和吸附能力,已被提议作为解决这一问题的新方法。在此,我们在充满孔隙空间60%水分的土壤湿度条件下,通过一项为期120天的微观实验,比较了生物炭-鸡粪混合堆肥(BM)和鸡粪堆肥(M)对土壤生物学性质和过程的影响。我们的结果表明,添加BM和M显著提高了土壤总碳和总氮、无机氮和氯化钾可提取有机氮、微生物生物量碳和氮、纤维素酶活性、产NO细菌和真菌的丰度以及NO和CO的气体排放。然而,在整个实验期间,与M处理相比,BM显著降低了土壤CO和NO排放,分别降低了35%和27%。在培养的第一周,N-NO位点偏好,即中心位置(δN)和末端位置(δN)的N-NO差异,M约为17‰,BM约为26‰,这表明BM抑制了细菌反硝化和/或硝化细菌反硝化产生的NO。这一推断与观察结果一致,即BM处理中土壤氨基葡萄糖苷酶活性和基因丰度低于M处理。此外,BM处理中的土壤过氧化物酶活性高于M处理,这意味着BM处理中土壤有机碳更稳定。我们的数据表明,与鸡粪堆肥相比,生物炭-鸡粪混合堆肥通过控制土壤有机碳的稳定性和微生物功能群(尤其是细菌反硝化菌)的活性,可大幅减少土壤NO排放。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验