State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Information Traceability for Agricultural Products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Information Traceability for Agricultural Products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Environ Int. 2024 Oct;192:109028. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109028. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
The use of biochar to reduce the gas emissions from paddy soils is a promising approach. However, the manner in which biochar and soil microbial communities interact to affect CO, CH, and NO emissions is not clearly understood, particularly when compared with other amendments. In this study, high-throughput sequencing, soil metabolomics, and quantitative real-time PCR were utilized to compare the effects of biochar (BC) and organic manure (OM) on soil microbial community structure, metabolomic profiles and functional genes, and ultimately CO, CH, and NO emissions. Results indicated that BC and OM had opposite effects on soil CO and NO emissions, with BC resulting in lower emissions and OM resulting in higher emissions, whereas BC, OM, and their combined amendments increased cumulative CH emissions by 19.5 %, 31.6 %, and 49.1 %, respectively. BC amendment increased the abundance of methanogens (Methanobacterium and Methanocella) and denitrifying bacteria (Anaerolinea and Gemmatimonas), resulting in an increase in the abundance of mcrA, amoA, amoB, and nosZ genes and the secretion of a flavonoid (chrysosplenetin), which caused the generation of CH and the reduction of NO to N, thereby accelerating CH emissions while reducing NO emissions. Simultaneously, OM amendment increased the abundance of the methanogen Caldicoprobacter and denitrifying Acinetobacter, resulting in increased abundance of mcrA, amoA, amoB, nirK, and nirS genes and the catabolism of carbohydrates [maltotriose, D-(+)-melezitose, D-(+)-cellobiose, and maltotetraose], thereby enhancing CH and NO emissions. Moreover, puerarin produced by Bacillus metabolism may contribute to the reduction in CO emissions by BC amendment, but increase in CO emissions by OM amendment. These findings reveal how BC and OM affect greenhouse gas emissions by modulating soil microbial communities, functional genes, and metabolomic profiles.
利用生物炭来减少稻田气体排放是一种很有前景的方法。然而,生物炭和土壤微生物群落相互作用影响 CO、CH 和 NO 排放的方式尚不清楚,特别是与其他改良剂相比。在这项研究中,利用高通量测序、土壤代谢组学和定量实时 PCR 来比较生物炭 (BC) 和有机肥 (OM) 对土壤微生物群落结构、代谢组谱和功能基因的影响,最终影响 CO、CH 和 NO 的排放。结果表明,BC 和 OM 对土壤 CO 和 NO 排放有相反的影响,BC 导致排放量较低,OM 导致排放量较高,而 BC、OM 及其组合改良剂分别使累积 CH 排放量增加了 19.5%、31.6%和 49.1%。BC 改良剂增加了产甲烷菌 (Methanobacterium 和 Methanocella) 和反硝化细菌 (Anaerolinea 和 Gemmatimonas) 的丰度,导致 mcrA、amoA、amoB 和 nosZ 基因的丰度增加,并分泌了一种类黄酮 (chrysosplenetin),导致 CH 的产生和 NO 还原为 N,从而加速 CH 排放,同时减少 NO 排放。同时,OM 改良剂增加了产甲烷菌 Caldicoprobacter 和反硝化菌 Acinetobacter 的丰度,导致 mcrA、amoA、amoB、nirK 和 nirS 基因的丰度增加,并代谢碳水化合物 [麦芽三糖、D-(+)-密二糖、D-(+)-纤维二糖和麦芽四糖],从而增强 CH 和 NO 的排放。此外,芽孢杆菌代谢产生的葛根素可能有助于减少 BC 改良剂对 CO 排放的减少,但增加 OM 改良剂对 CO 排放的增加。这些发现揭示了生物炭和有机肥如何通过调节土壤微生物群落、功能基因和代谢组谱来影响温室气体排放。