Suppr超能文献

两种再治疗系统去除牙胶尖的显微CT评估

Micro-CT Evaluation of Gutta-Percha Removal by Two Retreatment Systems.

作者信息

Alberto Rubino Gustavo, de Miranda Candeiro George Táccio, Gonzales Freire Laila, Faga Iglecias Elaine, de Mello Lemos Érico, Luiz Caldeira Celso, Gavini Giulio

机构信息

Faculdade de Odontologia, Post-graduate Program in Endodontics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Centro Universitário Christus, Curso de Odontologia, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring;13(2):221-227. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i2.18599.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present research was to compare the remaining filling material and the volumes of dentine removed after retreatment of curved canals with two rotary systems naming ProTaper Universal Retreatment and Mani NRT-GPR using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Forty mandibular molars containing two completely separated canals, with curvature angle of 25-35 and a curvature radius <10 mm were prepared to the Mtwo instrument 35/0.04 and filled with warm gutta-percha and AH-Plus sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (=20), according to the retreatment system evaluated: ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PR group) or Mani NRT-GPR (MR group). Retreatment was considered complete when the working length was reached and when smooth dentinal walls were observed, with no evidence of filling material adhered to instruments or in the irrigating solution. Preoperative and postoperative micro-CT images were obtained with an isotropic voxel size of 11.88 µm to observe the volume of residual filling material in the canals and dentine removed after retreatment. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's -test (<0.05).

RESULTS

The mean percentage of remaining filling material was 12.96% for PR group and 24.26% for MR group (=0.0056). The percentage of dentin removal was greater in the PR group (5.02%) than MR group (1.36%) (=0.0028). Both systems failed to completely remove the filling material from the canals.

CONCLUSION

ProTaper Universal Retreatment system was more effective than Mani NRT-GPR system regarding removal of root filling material and also removed significantly more dentine after retreatment of curved mesial root canals of mandibular molars.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是使用微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)比较两种旋转系统(即ProTaper Universal Retreatment和Mani NRT-GPR)对弯曲根管再治疗后剩余的充填材料以及去除的牙本质体积。

方法和材料

选取40颗下颌磨牙,每颗牙包含两条完全分开的根管,弯曲角度为25-35度,弯曲半径<10 mm,用Mtwo器械35/0.04进行预备,并用热牙胶和AH-Plus封闭剂充填。根据所评估的再治疗系统,将牙齿随机分为2组(每组=20):ProTaper Universal Retreatment(PR组)或Mani NRT-GPR(MR组)。当达到工作长度且观察到牙本质壁光滑,且没有充填材料附着在器械上或冲洗液中的迹象时,认为再治疗完成。术前和术后用各向同性体素大小为- 11.88 µm的micro-CT图像观察根管内残余充填材料的体积以及再治疗后去除的牙本质。采用学生t检验进行统计学分析(<0.05)。

结果

PR组剩余充填材料的平均百分比为12.96%,MR组为24.26%(=0.0056)。PR组牙本质去除百分比(5.02%)高于MR组(1.36%)(=0.0028)。两种系统均未能完全从根管中去除充填材料。

结论

在去除下颌磨牙弯曲近中根管的根充材料方面,ProTaper Universal Retreatment系统比Mani NRT-GPR系统更有效,并且在再治疗后去除的牙本质也明显更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a3/5911298/e1e3ce4bc9d9/iej-13-221-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验