Bincelli Seckler Iris Nogueira, Pelegrine Rina Andréa, Stringheta Carolina Pessoa, Lopes Ricardo Tadeu, de Sá Silva Aline Saddock, da Silveira Bueno Carlos Eduardo
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisa São Leopoldo Mandic, Endodontia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Laboratory of Nuclear Instrumentation, Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute of Graduate Studies and Engineering Research (COPPE), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Iran Endod J. 2024;19(3):199-207. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i3.43580.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two endodontic cleaning techniques, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and the XP-endo Finisher R (XPR) system, in removing residual filling material during endodontic retreatment procedures.
Forty mandibular premolars with oval canals were divided into four groups based on the sealer used (AH-Plus or Bio-C Sealer) and the cleaning technique employed (PUI or XPR). To ensure uniformity of canal volume among groups, initial micro-CT scans were conducted. The canals were instrumented, filled, and then re-instrumented before undergoing either PUI or XPR cleaning techniques. Residual filling material volumes were assessed through micro-CT scans, and statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Following instrumentation, there was no significant difference in residual filling material volumes between AH-Plus and Bio-C Sealer groups (1.35 mmand 1.02 mm, respectively; >0.05). However, after supplementary cleaning techniques, XPR-cleaned specimens exhibited significantly less residual material compared to PUI-cleaned specimens (0.01 mm and 0.29 mm for Bio-C Sealer, and 0.07 mm and. 0.30 mm for AH-Plus, <0.05).
The XPR system was found to be more effective than PUI in removing residual filling material from Bio-C Sealer-filled root canals. This highlights its potential as a useful supplementary cleaning technique in endodontic retreatment procedures.
本研究旨在比较两种根管清理技术,即被动超声冲洗(PUI)和XP-endo Finisher R(XPR)系统,在根管再治疗过程中去除残留充填材料的效果。
将40颗具有椭圆形根管的下颌前磨牙根据所使用的封闭剂(AH-Plus或Bio-C封闭剂)和所采用的清理技术(PUI或XPR)分为四组。为确保各组根管容积的一致性,进行了初始微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)。对根管进行预备、充填,然后在采用PUI或XPR清理技术之前再次进行预备。通过微计算机断层扫描评估残留充填材料的体积,并使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。
根管预备后,AH-Plus组和Bio-C封闭剂组的残留充填材料体积无显著差异(分别为1.35立方毫米和1.02立方毫米;P>0.05)。然而,在采用辅助清理技术后,与PUI清理的标本相比,XPR清理的标本残留材料明显更少(Bio-C封闭剂组分别为0.01立方毫米和0.29立方毫米,AH-Plus组分别为0.07立方毫米和0.30立方毫米,P<0.05)。
发现XPR系统在从Bio-C封闭剂充填的根管中去除残留充填材料方面比PUI更有效。这突出了其作为根管再治疗过程中一种有用的辅助清理技术的潜力。