• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警觉性任务可以在线进行管理吗?一项重复研究与讨论。

Can vigilance tasks be administered online? A replication and discussion.

作者信息

Claypoole Victoria L, Neigel Alexis R, Fraulini Nicholas W, Hancock Gabriella M, Szalma James L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida.

U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Sep;44(9):1348-1355. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000538. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000538
PMID:29708382
Abstract

Recently, experimental studies of vigilance have been deployed using online data collection methods. This data collection strategy is not new to the psychological sciences, but it is relatively new to basic research assessing vigilance performance, as studies in this area of research tend to collect data in the laboratory or in the field. The present study partially replicated the results of a newly developed online vigilance task (Thomson, Besner, & Smilek, 2016). A sample of 130 participants completed the semantic vigilance task created by Thomson et al. (2016) in a research laboratory setting. The present results replicated Thomson et al. (2016) when nonparametric and corrected signal detection measures were used. We suggest that some vigilance tasks typically performed in the laboratory could be administered online. However, we encourage researchers to consider the following factors prior to studying vigilance performance online: (a) the type of vigilance task, (b) the length of the vigilance task, and (c) the signal detection indices most appropriate for their research. It is quite possible that some analyses may yield significant results, whereas other signal detection measures may not (i.e., parametric indices vs. nonparametric indices vs. "corrected" indices) and this point is discussed further in our article. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

最近,警觉性的实验研究采用了在线数据收集方法。这种数据收集策略对心理学领域而言并不新鲜,但对于评估警觉性表现的基础研究来说相对较新,因为该研究领域的实验往往在实验室或实地收集数据。本研究部分重复了一项新开发的在线警觉性任务的结果(汤姆森、贝斯纳和斯米莱克,2016年)。130名参与者在研究实验室环境中完成了汤姆森等人(2016年)创建的语义警觉性任务。当使用非参数和校正后的信号检测指标时,本研究结果重复了汤姆森等人(2016年)的结果。我们认为,一些通常在实验室进行的警觉性任务可以在线实施。然而,我们鼓励研究人员在进行在线警觉性表现研究之前考虑以下因素:(a)警觉性任务的类型,(b)警觉性任务的时长,以及(c)最适合其研究的信号检测指标。很有可能某些分析会得出显著结果,而其他信号检测指标则不然(即参数指标与非参数指标与“校正后”指标),这一点在我们的文章中会进一步讨论。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )

相似文献

1
Can vigilance tasks be administered online? A replication and discussion.警觉性任务可以在线进行管理吗?一项重复研究与讨论。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Sep;44(9):1348-1355. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000538. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
A critical examination of the research and theoretical underpinnings discussed in Thomson, Besner, and Smilek (2016).对汤姆森、贝斯纳和斯米莱克(2016年)所讨论的研究及理论基础进行批判性审视。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Jul;124(4):525-531. doi: 10.1037/rev0000066.
3
A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs.一项新的语义警觉任务:警觉性下降、工作量以及对双重任务成本的敏感性。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jan;234(1):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4444-0. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
4
The Effects of Event Rate on a Cognitive Vigilance Task.事件率对认知警戒任务的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 May;61(3):440-450. doi: 10.1177/0018720818790840. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Evaluative social presence can improve vigilance performance, but vigilance is still hard work and is stressful.评价性社会存在感可以提高警觉性表现,但警觉性仍然是一项艰苦的工作,并且会带来压力。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):616-627. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000635. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Rest Is Still Best.休息仍然是最好的。
Hum Factors. 2017 Feb;59(1):91-100. doi: 10.1177/0018720816683509.
7
A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks.对现代警觉任务中敏感性丧失证据的批判性审视。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jan;123(1):70-83. doi: 10.1037/rev0000021. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
8
Vigilance Tasks: Unpleasant, Mentally Demanding, and Stressful Even When Time Flies.警戒任务:即使时间飞逝,也令人不快、需要高度集中精力,而且压力大。
Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):225-242. doi: 10.1177/0018720818796015. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused.短暂的精神休息和无内容的提示可能无法让你保持专注。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 May;219(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3065-0. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
10
Measuring vigilance while assessing the functioning of the three attentional networks: the ANTI-Vigilance task.测量警觉性的同时评估三个注意网络的功能:ANTI-Vigilance 任务。
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jun 15;198(2):312-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The ANTI-Vea-UGR Platform: A Free Online Resource to Measure Attentional Networks (Alertness, Orienting, and Executive Control) Functioning and Executive/Arousal Vigilance.ANTI-Vea-UGR平台:一个用于测量注意力网络(警觉性、定向和执行控制)功能以及执行/唤醒警觉性的免费在线资源。
J Intell. 2023 Sep 8;11(9):181. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11090181.
2
Psychometric curves reveal changes in bias, lapse rate, and guess rate in an online vigilance task.心理计量曲线揭示了在线警戒任务中偏差、失误率和猜测率的变化。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2879-2893. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02652-1. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
A desire for distraction: uncovering the rates of media multitasking during online research studies.
一心多用的欲望:揭示在线研究中进行媒体多任务处理的比率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 16;13(1):781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27606-3.
4
Measuring attention and vigilance in the laboratory vs. online: The split-half reliability of the ANTI-Vea.在实验室和在线环境下测量注意力和警觉性:ANTI-Vea 的分半信度。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1124-1147. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01483-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Brain Connectivity Analysis Under Semantic Vigilance and Enhanced Mental States.语义警觉和增强心理状态下的脑连接性分析
Brain Sci. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):363. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9120363.