• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价性社会存在感可以提高警觉性表现,但警觉性仍然是一项艰苦的工作,并且会带来压力。

Evaluative social presence can improve vigilance performance, but vigilance is still hard work and is stressful.

机构信息

United States Air Force Research Laboratory.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):616-627. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000635. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000635
PMID:30896196
Abstract

Vigilance is the ability to sustain attention over a period of time. Previous research has indicated that vigilance tasks are hard work and are stressful for human operators. Performance tends to decline with time on task, and workload and stress typically increase during the course of the vigil. Methods that could be used to overcome the adverse effects of vigilance (i.e., stress, workload, poor performance) includes social facilitation factors, such as performing the task while under observation. Thus, the present experiments examined the effects of multiple forms of social facilitation on vigilance, as well as the stress and workload associated with performing the task. Over 2 experiments, 284 participants completed a 24-min cognitive vigilance task. The results indicated that evaluative-based forms of social presence (i.e., direct monitoring, electronic performance monitoring) were associated with improved detection performance. The mere social presence of a monitor did not significantly influence vigilance performance. The results also demonstrated that social facilitation (in any form) did not impose additional stress or workload on the observers. These novel results have both important practical and theoretical implications for both vigilance performance and social facilitation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

警戒是在一段时间内保持注意力的能力。先前的研究表明,警戒任务对人类操作者来说是一项艰苦的工作,并且具有压力。随着任务时间的推移,性能往往会下降,而工作量和压力通常会在警戒过程中增加。可以用来克服警戒不利影响(即压力、工作量、表现不佳)的方法包括社会促进因素,例如在观察下执行任务。因此,本实验研究了多种形式的社会促进对警戒的影响,以及与执行任务相关的压力和工作量。在两项实验中,284 名参与者完成了 24 分钟的认知警戒任务。结果表明,基于评价的社会存在形式(即直接监控、电子绩效监控)与提高检测性能有关。仅仅有监控员的社会存在并没有显著影响警戒绩效。结果还表明,社会促进(任何形式)不会给观察者带来额外的压力或工作量。这些新的结果对于警戒性能和社会促进都具有重要的实际和理论意义。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Evaluative social presence can improve vigilance performance, but vigilance is still hard work and is stressful.评价性社会存在感可以提高警觉性表现,但警觉性仍然是一项艰苦的工作,并且会带来压力。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):616-627. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000635. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Independent Coactors May Improve Performance and Lower Workload: Viewing Vigilance Under Social Facilitation.独立合作可能会提高绩效和降低工作量:从社会促进的角度看警戒。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):822-832. doi: 10.1177/0018720818769268. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
Examining social facilitation in vigilance: a hit and a miss.审视警觉中的社会促进作用:一次成功与一次失败。
Ergonomics. 2017 Nov;60(11):1485-1499. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1308563. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Vigilance Tasks: Unpleasant, Mentally Demanding, and Stressful Even When Time Flies.警戒任务:即使时间飞逝,也令人不快、需要高度集中精力,而且压力大。
Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):225-242. doi: 10.1177/0018720818796015. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Effects of state motivation in overload and underload vigilance task scenarios.状态动机在超负荷和低负荷警觉任务场景中的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
The Effects of Event Rate on a Cognitive Vigilance Task.事件率对认知警戒任务的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 May;61(3):440-450. doi: 10.1177/0018720818790840. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Task Engagement and the Vigilance Decrement Revisited: Expanding Upon the Work of Joel S. Warm Using a Semantic Vigilance Paradigm.任务参与度与警戒衰减再探:使用语义警戒范式拓展乔尔·S·沃姆的工作。
Hum Factors. 2019 May;61(3):462-473. doi: 10.1177/0018720819835086. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
The Independence and Interdependence of Coacting Observers in Regard to Performance Efficiency, Workload, and Stress in a Vigilance Task.协同观察者在警戒任务中绩效效率、工作量和压力方面的独立性与相互依赖性
Hum Factors. 2016 Sep;58(6):915-26. doi: 10.1177/0018720816646657. Epub 2016 May 5.
9
Where is my mind? Examining mind-wandering and vigilance performance.我的思绪飘到哪里去了?探究走神与警觉表现。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):557-571. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5438-5. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Ceci n'est pas un walrus: lexical processing in vigilance performance.这不是海象:警觉表现中的词汇处理
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Mar;236(3):867-879. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5184-8. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural bases of social facilitation and inhibition: how peer presence affects elementary eye movements.社会促进与抑制的神经基础:同伴在场如何影响基本眼动
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jun 17;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae079.