School of Chemical Sciences, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Chemistry. 2018 May 11;24(27):7010-7025. doi: 10.1002/chem.201800339. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
Titanium catalysis generally prefers redox-neutral mechanisms. Yet it has been reported that titanium could promote bond formations in a way similar to reductive elimination. Accordingly, redox catalytic cycles involving Ti /Ti cycling have been considered. By studying, as an example, the carboamination of alkynes with alkenes and azobenzene catalyzed by the [Ti ]=NPh imido complex, we performed DFT computations to gain an understanding of how the "abnormal" catalysis takes place, thereby allowing us to clarify whether the catalysis really follows Ti /Ti redox mechanisms. The reaction first forms an azatitanacyclohexene by alkyne addition to the [Ti ]=NPh bond, followed by alkene insertion. The azatitanacyclohexene can either undergo C -C coupling, to afford bicyclo[3.1.0]imine, or β-H elimination, to yield a [Ti ]-H hydride, which then undergoes C =C or C =C insertion to give an α,β- or β,γ-unsaturated imine, respectively. Both the geometric and electronic structures indicate that the catalytic cycles proceed through redox-neutral mechanisms. The alternative redox mechanisms (e.g., by N-H or C-H reductive elimination) are substantially less favorable. We concluded that electronically, the Ti catalysis intrinsically favors the redox-neutral mechanism, because a redox pathway would involve Ti structures either in the triplet ground state or in the high-lying open-shell singlet state, but the involvement of triplet Ti structures is spin-forbidden and that of singlet Ti structures is energetically disadvantageous.
钛催化通常倾向于氧化还原中性机制。然而,据报道,钛可以以类似于还原消除的方式促进键的形成。因此,已经考虑了涉及 Ti/Ti 循环的氧化还原催化循环。通过研究炔烃与烯烃和偶氮苯的碳酰胺化反应为例,我们进行了 DFT 计算,以了解“异常”催化是如何发生的,从而使我们能够澄清该催化是否真的遵循 Ti/Ti 氧化还原机制。反应首先通过炔烃加成到[Ti]=NPh 键形成氮杂钛杂环己烯,然后进行烯烃插入。氮杂钛杂环己烯可以进行 C-C 偶联,生成双环[3.1.0]亚胺,或者进行β-H 消除,生成[Ti]-H 氢化物,然后进行 C=C 或 C=C 插入,分别得到α,β-或β,γ-不饱和亚胺。几何和电子结构都表明催化循环通过氧化还原中性机制进行。替代的氧化还原机制(例如,通过 N-H 或 C-H 还原消除)则明显不太有利。我们得出结论,从电子角度来看,Ti 催化本质上倾向于氧化还原中性机制,因为氧化还原途径将涉及三重态基态或高能单重态的 Ti 结构,但三重态 Ti 结构的参与是自旋禁阻的,而单重态 Ti 结构的参与在能量上是不利的。