• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童哮喘的家用雾化器。家长的认知与做法。

Home nebulizers in childhood asthma. Parental perceptions and practices.

作者信息

Ryan C A, Willan A R, Wherrett B A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1988 Sep;27(9):420-4. doi: 10.1177/000992288802700902.

DOI:10.1177/000992288802700902
PMID:2970909
Abstract

Seventy five percent of 91 parents of asthmatic children (aged 6 months to 15.4 years) with home nebulizers, responded to a questionnaire that sought to document parental experience with this form of therapy. The most common indications for acquiring a nebulizer were inability to use metered dose inhalers and poor response or intolerance to oral medications. When the children were classified into those who used the nebulizer daily (27/69) and those who used it less than daily (42/69), we found that the daily users were more likely to be in the severest category of asthma, by parental assessment, prior to the home nebulization program (p = 0.0035). Retrospective, uncontrolled comparison before and after the acquisition of a home nebulizer showed significant decreases both in hospital admissions (1.7 vs 0.7; p less than 0.001) and total in-patient days (4.1 vs 1.7; p less than 0.0001). Home nebulizers are well tolerated by parents and children alike and may be associated with decreased morbidity.

摘要

91名患有哮喘的儿童(年龄在6个月至15.4岁之间)的家长中有家用雾化器,其中75%对一份旨在记录家长使用这种治疗方式经历的问卷做出了回应。购买雾化器最常见的原因是无法使用定量吸入器以及对口服药物反应不佳或不耐受。当将这些孩子分为每天使用雾化器的孩子(27/69)和并非每天使用雾化器的孩子(42/69)时,我们发现,在家用雾化治疗方案实施前,经家长评估,每天使用雾化器的孩子更有可能处于最严重的哮喘类别(p = 0.0035)。对购买家用雾化器前后进行回顾性、非对照比较显示,住院次数(1.7次对0.7次;p<0.001)和住院总天数(4.1天对1.7天;p<0.0001)均显著减少。家长和孩子对家用雾化器的耐受性都很好,而且它可能与发病率降低有关。

相似文献

1
Home nebulizers in childhood asthma. Parental perceptions and practices.儿童哮喘的家用雾化器。家长的认知与做法。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1988 Sep;27(9):420-4. doi: 10.1177/000992288802700902.
2
Efficacy of salbutamol by nebulizer versus metered dose inhaler with home-made non-valved spacer in acute exacerbation of childhood asthma.雾化吸入沙丁胺醇与使用自制无瓣储雾罐的定量气雾剂治疗儿童哮喘急性发作的疗效比较
Mymensingh Med J. 2012 Jan;21(1):66-71.
3
Does parental involvement in pediatric emergency department asthma treatment affect home management?父母参与小儿急诊科哮喘治疗是否会影响家庭管理?
J Asthma. 2009 Oct;46(8):792-5.
4
Home nebulizer therapy in asthmatics in Qatar.卡塔尔哮喘患者的家庭雾化治疗。
J Asthma. 1994;31(1):51-3. doi: 10.3109/02770909409056769.
5
Asthma and other wheezing disorders in children.儿童哮喘及其他喘息性疾病
Clin Evid. 2005 Dec(14):238-62.
6
Asthma and other wheezing disorders of childhood.儿童哮喘及其他喘息性疾病。
Clin Evid. 2003 Jun(9):287-317.
7
Asthma and other wheezing disorders in infants and children.婴幼儿哮喘及其他喘息性疾病
Clin Evid. 2004 Jun(11):328-59.
8
[Efficacy of two methods of administration of salbutamol-ipratropium bromide in asthma crises].[沙丁胺醇-异丙托溴铵两种给药方法在哮喘危象中的疗效]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2009 Sep-Oct;56(5):149-53.
9
[Metered-dose inhaler with spacer vs nebulization for severe and potentially severe acute asthma treatment in the pediatric emergency department].[在儿科急诊科使用带储物罐的定量吸入器与雾化吸入治疗重度及潜在重度急性哮喘]
Arch Pediatr. 2006 Mar;13(3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
10
A comparison of bronchodilator responses to albuterol delivered by ultrasonic versus jet nebulization in moderate to severe asthma.中度至重度哮喘患者中,超声雾化与喷射雾化吸入沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张剂反应比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Oct;77(4):292-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63323-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Nebuliser hood compared to mask in wheezy infants: aerosol therapy without tears!与面罩相比,雾化罩用于喘息性婴儿:无泪雾化治疗!
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Aug;88(8):719-23. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.8.719.