Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1677-1686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3197.
The effect of ticagrelor with or without aspirin on saphenous vein graft patency in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unknown.
To compare the effect of ticagrelor + aspirin or ticagrelor alone vs aspirin alone on saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after CABG.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, multicenter, open-label, clinical trial among 6 tertiary hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years with indications for elective CABG. Patients requiring urgent revascularization, concomitant cardiac surgery, dual antiplatelet or vitamin K antagonist therapy post-CABG, and who were at risk of serious bleeding were excluded. From July 2014 until November 2015, 1256 patients were identified and 500 were enrolled. Follow-up was completed in January 2017.
Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to start ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) + aspirin (100 mg once daily) (n = 168), ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) (n = 166), or aspirin (100 mg once daily) (n = 166) within 24 hours post-CABG. Neither patients nor treating physicians were blinded to allocation.
Primary outcome was saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after CABG (FitzGibbon grade A) adjudicated independently by a committee blinded to allocation. Saphenous vein graft patency was assessed by multislice computed tomographic angiography or coronary angiography.
Among 500 randomized patients (mean age, 63.6 years; women, 91 [18.2%]), 461 (92.2%) completed the trial. Saphenous vein graft patency rates 1 year post-CABG were 88.7% (432 of 487 vein grafts) with ticagrelor + aspirin; 82.8% (404 of 488 vein grafts) with ticagrelor alone; and 76.5% (371 of 485 vein grafts) with aspirin alone. The difference between ticagrelor + aspirin vs aspirin alone was statistically significant (12.2% [95% CI, 5.2% to 19.2%]; P < .001), whereas the difference between ticagrelor alone vs aspirin alone was not statistically significant (6.3% [95% CI, -1.1% to 13.7%]; P = .10). Five major bleeding episodes occurred during 1 year of follow-up (3 with ticagrelor + aspirin; 2 with ticagrelor alone).
Among patients undergoing elective CABG with saphenous vein grafting, ticagrelor + aspirin significantly increased graft patency after 1 year vs aspirin alone; there was no significant difference between ticagrelor alone and aspirin alone. Further research with more patients is needed to assess comparative bleeding risks.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02201771.
替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林对行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的隐静脉桥通畅率的影响尚不清楚。
比较替格瑞洛+阿司匹林与替格瑞洛单药或阿司匹林单药治疗 1 年后隐静脉桥通畅率的差异。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在中国 6 家三级医院进行的随机、多中心、开放标签临床试验。纳入标准为年龄 18 至 80 岁,有择期 CABG 适应证的患者。需要紧急血运重建、同期心脏手术、CABG 后双联抗血小板或维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗以及有严重出血风险的患者被排除在外。2014 年 7 月至 2015 年 11 月,共确定了 1256 名患者,其中 500 名符合条件的患者入组。随访于 2017 年 1 月完成。
患者在术后 24 小时内随机(1:1:1)接受替格瑞洛(90 mg,每日 2 次)+阿司匹林(100 mg,每日 1 次)(n=168)、替格瑞洛(90 mg,每日 2 次)(n=166)或阿司匹林(100 mg,每日 1 次)(n=166)治疗。患者和治疗医生均不知道分组情况。
主要终点是 1 年后 CABG 后隐静脉桥通畅率(FitzGibbon 分级 A),由对分组情况设盲的委员会独立判定。隐静脉桥通畅率通过多层螺旋 CT 血管造影或冠状动脉造影评估。
在 500 名随机分组的患者(平均年龄 63.6 岁;女性 91 例[18.2%])中,461 名(92.2%)完成了试验。CABG 术后 1 年时,替格瑞洛+阿司匹林组隐静脉桥通畅率为 88.7%(432 根静脉桥);替格瑞洛组为 82.8%(404 根静脉桥);阿司匹林组为 76.5%(371 根静脉桥)。替格瑞洛+阿司匹林组与阿司匹林组相比差异有统计学意义(12.2%[95%CI,5.2%至 19.2%];P<0.001),而替格瑞洛组与阿司匹林组之间差异无统计学意义(6.3%[95%CI,-1.1%至 13.7%];P=0.10)。在 1 年的随访期间,共发生 5 例大出血事件(替格瑞洛+阿司匹林组 3 例,替格瑞洛组 2 例)。
在接受择期 CABG 并伴有隐静脉桥移植术的患者中,与阿司匹林单药相比,替格瑞洛+阿司匹林可显著增加术后 1 年的桥通畅率;替格瑞洛单药与阿司匹林单药之间无显著差异。还需要更多的患者来评估比较出血风险。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT02201771。