Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于冠状动脉搭桥术后双重抗血小板治疗的Meta分析

Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Liyuan, Zhao Yingying, Zhang Shijie, Zhang Tao, Song Jian, Yun Yan, Wu Yi, Wang Zhengjun, Ma Xiaochun

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 8;12:1542437. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1542437. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the standard treatment regimen typically involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which includes a P2Y12 receptor antagonist in combination with aspirin. There is currently no clear consensus regarding the optimal DAPT strategy after CABG. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients post-CABG.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of eligible studies of patients undergoing CABG and receiving either aspirin plus clopidogrel (A + C) or aspirin plus ticagrelor (A + T) as antiplatelet therapy, was carried out. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), major bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, saphenous vein occlusion and total graft occlusion.

RESULTS

4 randomized controlled trials and 3 observational studies ( = 2,424) were eligible for final analysis. A + T was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.70,  < 0.001, p heterogeneity = 0.80, I = 0%) and cardiovascular mortality (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.82,  = 0.006, p heterogeneity = 0.71, I = 0%), compared with A + C group. No statistically significant difference was found in the rates of major bleeding (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.69-1.96;  = 0.57; p heterogeneity = 0.26; I = 23%) between two groups. Besides, the rates of MACCEs, myocardial infarction, stroke, total graft occlusion, revascularization and saphenous vein occlusion were comparable between two groups ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis presented the evidence supporting the use of A + T post-CAVG in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, with no increase in bleeding events, in comparison with A + C. Additional RCTs are needed to determine the optimal DAPT after CABG.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后,标准治疗方案通常包括双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),即P2Y12受体拮抗剂与阿司匹林联合使用。目前关于CABG后最佳DAPT策略尚无明确共识。本荟萃分析的目的是评估和比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在CABG术后患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

对接受CABG并接受阿司匹林加氯吡格雷(A + C)或阿司匹林加替格瑞洛(A + T)作为抗血小板治疗的符合条件的患者研究进行荟萃分析。感兴趣的结局包括全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)、大出血、心肌梗死、中风、血运重建、大隐静脉闭塞和总移植血管闭塞。

结果

4项随机对照试验和3项观察性研究(n = 2424)符合最终分析条件。与A + C组相比,A + T组全因死亡率(OR = 0.47,95%CI 0.31 - 0.70,P < 0.001,异质性P = 0.80,I² = 0%)和心血管死亡率(OR = 0.50,95%CI 0.31 - 0.82,P = 0.006,异质性P = 0.71,I² = 0%)风险降低。两组大出血发生率无统计学显著差异(OR = 1.16;95%CI 0.69 - 1.96;P = 0.57;异质性P = 0.26;I² = 23%)。此外,两组MACCE、心肌梗死、中风、总移植血管闭塞、血运重建和大隐静脉闭塞发生率相当(P > 0.05)。

结论

荟萃分析提供的证据支持CABG术后使用A + T降低全因死亡率和心血管死亡率,且与A + C相比出血事件未增加。需要更多随机对照试验来确定CABG后最佳DAPT方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b8e/12095165/dc224c861fb6/fcvm-12-1542437-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验