Gong Yanjun, Jeong Young-Hoon, Wang Tzung-Dau, Tan Jack Wei Chieh, Qian Juying, Yan Hongbing, Chan Mark Y, Chen Yundai, Zhang Shuning, Yuan Zuyi, Lu Tse-Min, Chen Jiyan, Zhou Yujie, Liu Bin, Fu Guosheng, Xu Yawei, Li Lang, Smith Sidney C, Ge Junbo, Huo Yong
Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
CAU Thrombosis and Biomarker Center, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong and Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
JACC Asia. 2025 Jul;5(7):821-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.010.
Growing clinical evidence has indicated that East Asian patients have a lower risk for cardiovascular events but a higher risk of serious bleeding during antiplatelet therapy compared with Western populations-referred to as the "East Asian Paradox." The unique risk-benefit tradeoff observed in East Asian populations has been a topic of interest, which may be influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors-such as specific atherothrombotic cardiovascular risks, helicobacter pylori infection, sites of cranial atherosclerosis, and low body weight. There exist knowledge gaps in the antiplatelet therapy among East Asian populations with coronary artery disease, such as the individualized assessment of ischemic and bleeding risk, de-escalation strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy and the compliance of long-term secondary prevention. A substantial body of positive evidence supporting de-escalation strategies of dual antiplatelet therapy comes from East Asia, possibly caused by the distinct therapeutic range of antiplatelet effects and heightened pharmacodynamic response to potent P2Y inhibitors observed in this population. This consensus update focuses on the latest progress and hotspot issues on antiplatelet therapy in the East Asian population with coronary artery disease and therapeutic recommendations based on the best available evidence.
越来越多的临床证据表明,与西方人群相比,东亚患者发生心血管事件的风险较低,但在抗血小板治疗期间发生严重出血的风险较高,这被称为“东亚悖论”。在东亚人群中观察到的独特的风险效益权衡一直是一个备受关注的话题,这可能受到遗传和环境风险因素复杂相互作用的影响,如特定的动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险、幽门螺杆菌感染、颅动脉粥样硬化部位和低体重。在患有冠状动脉疾病的东亚人群中,抗血小板治疗方面存在知识空白,如缺血和出血风险的个体化评估、双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯策略以及长期二级预防的依从性。大量支持双联抗血小板治疗降阶梯策略的阳性证据来自东亚,这可能是由于该人群中抗血小板作用的独特治疗范围以及对强效P2Y抑制剂的药效学反应增强所致。本共识更新聚焦于东亚冠状动脉疾病患者抗血小板治疗的最新进展和热点问题,并基于现有最佳证据提出治疗建议。