Liao Souqi, Dong Wenyan, Zhao Hui, Huang Ruijin, Qi Xufeng, Cai Dongqing
1Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Ministry of Education, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632 People's Republic of China.
2Joint Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong-Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632 China.
Cell Biosci. 2018 Apr 23;8:32. doi: 10.1186/s13578-018-0230-6. eCollection 2018.
Two studies have recently focused on adult heart regeneration in . While we reported on cardiac myogenic regeneration in after injury, Marshall and colleagues found no regeneration in an injured heart in Here, we would like to join the discussion initiated by Marshall et al. who debated the methods and species differences in both studies. We agree with their view that the species difference in cardiac regenerative capacity could lead to different results in both of these studies. Moreover, we suggest that the age of the animals used in these studies could lead to differences in regeneration. A 5-year old is much more advanced in age than a 1-year old . The other reason for the discrepancies could be the size of the clot. Due to different resection protocols, the clot formed after the endoscopic resection performed by Marshall et al. was much larger than that after a conventional resection, as used in our study. Furthermore, the difference in the site of injury could influence the healing and regeneration differences. The influence of the organismal age, techniques used to induce injury and site of injury on regeneration need to be examined in detail to assess the regenerative potential of the amphibian heart.
最近有两项研究聚焦于成年心脏再生。虽然我们报道了受伤后心脏的心肌再生情况,但马歇尔及其同事发现受伤心脏中没有再生现象。在此,我们想参与由马歇尔等人发起的讨论,他们对两项研究中的方法和物种差异进行了辩论。我们同意他们的观点,即心脏再生能力的物种差异可能导致这两项研究得出不同结果。此外,我们认为这些研究中所使用动物的年龄可能导致再生差异。一只5岁的[动物名称]比1岁的[动物名称]年龄大得多。差异的另一个原因可能是血栓的大小。由于切除方案不同,马歇尔等人进行内镜切除后形成的血栓比我们研究中使用的传统切除后形成的血栓大得多。此外,损伤部位的差异可能会影响愈合和再生差异。需要详细研究机体年龄、诱导损伤的技术和损伤部位对再生的影响,以评估两栖动物心脏的再生潜力。