• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》(STROBE)声明的职业医学与健康领域知名期刊中观察性研究的质量:一项横断面研究。

Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Aghazadeh-Attari Javad, Mobaraki Kazhal, Ahmadzadeh Jamal, Mansorian Behnam, Mohebbi Iraj

机构信息

Department of neurosurgery, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 2;11(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3367-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-018-3367-9
PMID:29720270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5932818/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study applied the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement to observational studies published in prestigious occupational medicine and health journals.

RESULTS

A total of 60 articles was evaluated. All sub-items were reported in 63.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.24-71.24%), not reported in 29.70% (95% CI, 20.2-39.2%), and not applicable in 6.56% (95% CI, 4.86-8.26%) of the studies. Of the 45 sub-items investigated in this survey, eight were reported 100% of the time, 13 were addressed in more than 90% of the articles, 22 were included in more than 75% of the studies, and 27 sub-items were applied in more than 50% of the articles published in the journals included in this study.

摘要

目的

本研究将《流行病学观察性研究报告强化声明》(STROBE)应用于发表在著名职业医学与健康期刊上的观察性研究。

结果

共评估了60篇文章。所有子项目在63.74%(95%置信区间[CI],56.24 - 71.24%)的研究中得到报告,在29.70%(95%CI,20.2 - 39.2%)的研究中未报告,在6.56%(95%CI,4.86 - 8.26%)的研究中不适用。在本次调查所研究的45个子项目中,8个在所有研究中均有报告,13个在超过90%的文章中有所涉及,22个在超过75%的研究中被纳入,27个子项目在本研究纳入的期刊发表的超过50%的文章中被应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0120/5932818/5ac4f0964eb0/13104_2018_3367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0120/5932818/5ac4f0964eb0/13104_2018_3367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0120/5932818/5ac4f0964eb0/13104_2018_3367_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study.基于《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》(STROBE)声明的职业医学与健康领域知名期刊中观察性研究的质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 2;11(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3367-9.
2
Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary Extension.《STROBE-Vet声明解释与阐述文件:加强流行病学观察性研究报告——兽医扩展版》
Zoonoses Public Health. 2016 Dec;63(8):662-698. doi: 10.1111/zph.12315. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
3
Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement.制定《加强流行病学观察性研究报告 - 兽医版(STROBE-Vet)声明》的方法与过程。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2016 Dec;63(8):651-661. doi: 10.1111/zph.12314. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology - veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement.制定加强流行病学观察性研究报告 - 兽医版(STROBE-Vet)声明的方法和过程。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Nov 1;134:188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.005.
5
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.加强观察性研究在流行病学中的报告 (STROBE):解释和说明。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1500-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
6
Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement.队列研究报告质量:强化观察性研究报告的流行病学(STROBE)声明后。
Epidemiol Health. 2011;33:e2011005. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2011005. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
7
Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.《STROBE-Vet声明解释与阐述文件:加强兽医学流行病学观察性研究报告》
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Nov;30(6):1896-1928. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14592. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
8
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察研究报告的强化(STROBE)声明:观察研究报告指南》。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
9
Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement.基于STROBE声明的耳鼻咽喉科观察性研究报告质量评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169316. eCollection 2017.
10
[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies].[《流行病学观察性研究报告强化规范(STROBE)声明:观察性研究报告指南》]
Gac Sanit. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):144-50. doi: 10.1157/13119325.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with knowledge, beliefs, and practices related to perinatal depression screening among rural maternal and child health workers: a multi-center cross-sectional study.农村妇幼保健工作者围产期抑郁症筛查相关知识、信念和行为的影响因素:一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07831-6.
2
Exploring the water, sanitation and hygiene status and health outcomes in Zimbabwe: a scoping review protocol.探索津巴布韦的水、环境卫生和个人卫生状况及健康结果:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):e082224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082224.
3
Statistical characteristics of analytical studies published in Peruvian medical journals from 2021 to 2022: A methodological study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement.基于STROBE声明的耳鼻咽喉科观察性研究报告质量评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169316. eCollection 2017.
2
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE-NI): an extension of the STROBE statement for neonatal infection research.加强新生儿感染的观察性研究报告规范(STROBE-NI):对新生儿感染研究的 STROBE 声明的扩展。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;16(10):e202-e213. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30082-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
2021 年至 2022 年秘鲁医学期刊发表的分析性研究的统计学特征:方法学研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0306334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306334. eCollection 2024.
4
Aortic propagation velocity in predicting coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.主动脉传播速度预测冠心病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34243. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034243.
5
Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19 - a retrospective cross-sectional study.比较新冠病毒疾病治疗方法的观察性临床研究报告质量欠佳——一项回顾性横断面研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01501-9.
6
A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of survival analyses of tuberculosis outcomes in Africa.一项对非洲结核病结局生存分析的实施和报告质量的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 27;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01280-3.
7
Quality, Equity and Utility of Observational Studies during 10 Years of Implementing the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative in 72 Countries.在72个国家实施结构化运营研究与培训倡议的10年期间观察性研究的质量、公平性和实用性
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 6;5(4):167. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed5040167.
8
Reporting guideline checklists are not quality evaluation forms: they are guidance for writing.报告指南清单并非质量评估表格:它们是写作指南。
Health Sci Rep. 2020 May 3;3(2):e165. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.165. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
A systematic review of quality of reporting in registered intimate partner violence studies: where can we improve?对已注册的亲密伴侣暴力研究报告质量的系统评价:我们可以在哪些方面改进?
J Inj Violence Res. 2019 Jul;11(2):123-136. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1140. Epub 2019 May 26.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An extension of the STROBE statement.
加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范——营养流行病学(STROBE-nut):STROBE声明的扩展
Nutr Bull. 2016 Sep;41(3):240-251. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12217. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
4
Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement: A Systematic Review.整形外科观察性研究的报告质量有待提高:一项系统评价。
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):585-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000419.
5
Cross-sectional studies published in Indian journal of community medicine: evaluation of adherence to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement.发表于《印度社区医学杂志》的横断面研究:对遵守流行病学观察性研究强化报告声明情况的评估
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Nov;4(6):875-8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.144889.
6
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察研究报告的强化(STROBE)声明:观察研究报告指南》。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.医疗保健中的系统评价:评估对照临床试验的质量。
BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):42-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42.
8
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.为什么我们需要观察性研究来评估医疗保健的有效性。
BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1215-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215.