• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量高阶模糊偏好。

Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences.

作者信息

Baillon Aurélien, Schlesinger Harris, van de Kuilen Gijs

机构信息

1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

2University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA.

出版信息

Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):233-256. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9542-3. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10683-017-9542-3
PMID:29720888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5913386/
Abstract

We report the results from an experiment designed to measure attitudes towards ambiguity beyond ambiguity aversion. In particular, we implement recently-proposed model-free preference conditions of ambiguity prudence and ambiguity temperance. Ambiguity prudence has been shown to play an important role in precautionary behavior and the mere presence of ambiguity averse agents in markets. We observe that the majority of individuals' decisions are consistent with ambiguity aversion, ambiguity prudence and ambiguity temperance. This finding confirms the prediction of many popular (specifications of) ambiguity models and has important implications for models of prevention behavior.

摘要

我们报告了一项旨在测量除模糊厌恶之外对模糊态度的实验结果。具体而言，我们实施了最近提出的关于模糊审慎和模糊节制的无模型偏好条件。模糊审慎已被证明在预防行为以及市场中仅存在模糊厌恶主体方面发挥着重要作用。我们观察到，大多数个体的决策与模糊厌恶、模糊审慎和模糊节制相一致。这一发现证实了许多流行的（特定形式的）模糊模型的预测，并且对预防行为模型具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/1355e3d1023e/10683_2017_9542_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/fc2d3cdc4a56/10683_2017_9542_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/9f789ce28479/10683_2017_9542_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/37e439f43c55/10683_2017_9542_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/edbbdea2eeb6/10683_2017_9542_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/52b7b84d7155/10683_2017_9542_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/60f2f98147dc/10683_2017_9542_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/a193c0221bbd/10683_2017_9542_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/6e2d2d00d043/10683_2017_9542_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/48ce3b6c44f0/10683_2017_9542_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/ad074e063f4e/10683_2017_9542_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/1355e3d1023e/10683_2017_9542_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/fc2d3cdc4a56/10683_2017_9542_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/9f789ce28479/10683_2017_9542_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/37e439f43c55/10683_2017_9542_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/edbbdea2eeb6/10683_2017_9542_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/52b7b84d7155/10683_2017_9542_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/60f2f98147dc/10683_2017_9542_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/a193c0221bbd/10683_2017_9542_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/6e2d2d00d043/10683_2017_9542_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/48ce3b6c44f0/10683_2017_9542_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/ad074e063f4e/10683_2017_9542_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/1355e3d1023e/10683_2017_9542_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences.测量高阶模糊偏好。
Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):233-256. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9542-3. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Higher-order risk preferences in social settings.社交环境中的高阶风险偏好。
Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):434-456. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9541-4. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain.测量健康领域的多元风险偏好。
J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;64:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Insurance decisions under nonperformance risk and ambiguity.非履约风险和模糊性下的保险决策。
J Risk Uncertain. 2021;63(3):229-253. doi: 10.1007/s11166-021-09364-7. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field.估计多重先验模型中的模糊偏好和认知：来自实地的证据。
J Risk Uncertain. 2015 Dec;51(3):219-244. doi: 10.1007/s11166-015-9227-2. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Risk preferences: consequences for test and treatment thresholds and optimal cutoffs.风险偏好：对检验阈值、治疗阈值及最佳临界值的影响
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):33-41. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493969. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Neural Correlates of Decision-Making Under Ambiguity and Conflict.模糊性和冲突情境下决策的神经关联
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Nov 27;9:325. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00325. eCollection 2015.
8
Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments.来源偏好与模糊规避：来自行为和神经成像实验的模型与证据
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008;20:179-201.
9
Neither Threat of Shock nor Acute Psychosocial Stress Affects Ambiguity Attitudes.电击威胁和急性社会心理压力均不影响对模糊性的态度。
Affect Sci. 2022;3(2):425-437. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00109-6. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
Low- and high-testosterone individuals exhibit decreased aversion to economic risk.低睾酮和高睾酮个体表现出对经济风险的厌恶感降低。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):447-53. doi: 10.1177/0956797611401752. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
An investigation of the convergent validity and test-retest reliability of three uncertainty preference measures.三种不确定性偏好测量方法的收敛效度与重测信度研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 9;57(8):221. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02729-9.
2
Permutation tests for experimental data.实验数据的排列检验
Exp Econ. 2023 Apr 1:1-38. doi: 10.1007/s10683-023-09799-6.
3
Insurance decisions under nonperformance risk and ambiguity.非履约风险和模糊性下的保险决策。
J Risk Uncertain. 2021;63(3):229-253. doi: 10.1007/s11166-021-09364-7. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
4
The strength of sensitivity to ambiguity.对模糊性的敏感程度
Theory Decis. 2018;85(3):275-302. doi: 10.1007/s11238-018-9657-9. Epub 2018 Mar 19.