Suppr超能文献

测量高阶模糊偏好。

Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences.

作者信息

Baillon Aurélien, Schlesinger Harris, van de Kuilen Gijs

机构信息

1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

2University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA.

出版信息

Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):233-256. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9542-3. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

Abstract

We report the results from an experiment designed to measure attitudes towards ambiguity beyond ambiguity aversion. In particular, we implement recently-proposed model-free preference conditions of ambiguity prudence and ambiguity temperance. Ambiguity prudence has been shown to play an important role in precautionary behavior and the mere presence of ambiguity averse agents in markets. We observe that the majority of individuals' decisions are consistent with ambiguity aversion, ambiguity prudence and ambiguity temperance. This finding confirms the prediction of many popular (specifications of) ambiguity models and has important implications for models of prevention behavior.

摘要

我们报告了一项旨在测量除模糊厌恶之外对模糊态度的实验结果。具体而言,我们实施了最近提出的关于模糊审慎和模糊节制的无模型偏好条件。模糊审慎已被证明在预防行为以及市场中仅存在模糊厌恶主体方面发挥着重要作用。我们观察到,大多数个体的决策与模糊厌恶、模糊审慎和模糊节制相一致。这一发现证实了许多流行的(特定形式的)模糊模型的预测,并且对预防行为模型具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d85e/5913386/fc2d3cdc4a56/10683_2017_9542_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验