Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, and.
Translational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Blood. 2018 Jun 14;131(24):2712-2719. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-10-811216. Epub 2018 May 3.
The role of thrombophilia testing in predicting catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after an incident (ie, first) catheter-related DVT in children remains unclear. The present study investigated the association between thrombophilia and recurrent catheter-related DVT. Children with thrombophilia testing, performed according to the clinician's judgment and the family's preference, and a history of objectively confirmed catheter-related DVT were included in the study. Recurrent catheter-related DVT after placement of a new catheter was the main outcome. Thrombophilia was classified as minor, major, or none. Analysis was conducted using mixed effect logistic regression. A total of 245 patients had 1,365 catheters inserted; 941 of these catheters were placed after the incident catheter-related DVT. Anticoagulants as treatment or prophylaxis were administered in 78.1% of inserted catheters for at least 50% of the time they were in place. Minor thrombophilia was found in 12.7% of patients, whereas major thrombophilia was seen in 8.2% of children. The incidence rate of recurrent events was 0.23/100 catheter-days (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.28 catheter-days); 34.3% (95% confidence interval, 28.6%-40.0%) of patients requiring a new catheter after their incident thrombotic event had at least 1 recurrent event. The incidence proportion of bleeding complications was 4.6/100 patients receiving anticoagulation. Young age of the patient at the time of catheter insertion and lack of administration of treatment or prophylactic doses of anticoagulant were predictive of recurrent events. In contrast, thrombophilia was not predictive of recurrent catheter-related DVT during subsequent catheter insertions among tested patients. Our findings suggest that thrombophilia testing to predict recurrence in these patients may be unnecessary.
在儿童中,血栓形成倾向检测在预测首次导管相关深静脉血栓形成(DVT)后导管相关 DVT 的作用仍不清楚。本研究调查了血栓形成倾向与复发性导管相关 DVT 之间的关系。本研究纳入了根据临床医生的判断和患者家庭的偏好进行血栓形成倾向检测且有明确诊断的导管相关 DVT 病史的患儿。新导管置入后发生的导管相关 DVT 复发是主要结局。血栓形成倾向分为轻度、重度和无。采用混合效应逻辑回归进行分析。共纳入 245 例患者,有 1365 个导管置入,其中 941 个导管是在首次导管相关 DVT 后放置的。在至少 50%的导管留置时间内,78.1%的置入导管使用了抗凝药物进行治疗或预防。12.7%的患者存在轻度血栓形成倾向,8.2%的患儿存在重度血栓形成倾向。复发性事件的发生率为 0.23/100 导管日(95%置信区间为 0.19-0.28 导管日);在首次血栓事件后需要新导管的患者中,34.3%(95%置信区间为 28.6%-40.0%)至少有 1 次复发事件。接受抗凝治疗的患者中,出血并发症的发生率为 4.6/100 例。在导管置入时患者年龄较小和未给予治疗或预防剂量的抗凝治疗与复发性事件相关。相反,在接受检测的患者中,血栓形成倾向并不能预测随后导管置入期间的复发性导管相关 DVT。我们的研究结果表明,对于这些患者,血栓形成倾向检测可能不能预测复发,因此可能没有必要进行检测。