Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;72(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2169-y. Epub 2013 May 1.
Whether an anticoagulant prophylaxis is needed for patients with cancer with a central venous catheter is a highly controversial subject. We designed a study to compare different prophylactic strategies over 3 months of treatment.
We performed a phase III prospective, open-label randomized trial. After the insertion of a central venous access device, consecutive patients with planned chemotherapy for cancer were randomized to no anticoagulant prophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin [low molecular weight heparin (LMWH); with isocoagulation doses], or warfarin 1 mg/day. Treatments were given over the first 3 months. Doppler ultrasound and venographies were performed on days 1 and 90, respectively, or sooner in case of clinical presumption of thrombosis.
A total of 420 patients were randomized, and 407 were evaluable. Forty-two catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred (10.3 %), 20 in those with no anticoagulation, 8 in those receiving warfarin, and 14 in those receiving LMWH. Nine additional non-related catheter deep vein thrombosis (CDVT) occurred. Anticoagulation significantly reduced the incidence of catheter-related DVT (p = 0.035) and catheter non-related DVT (p = 0.007), with no difference between warfarin and LMWH. Safety was good (3.4 % of attributable events) but compliance with randomized prophylaxis was lower than expected.
Prophylaxis showed a benefit regarding catheter-related and non-catheter-related DVT with no increase in serious side effects.
癌症合并中央静脉置管患者是否需要抗凝预防是一个极具争议的问题。我们设计了一项研究,旨在比较 3 个月治疗期间不同的预防策略。
我们进行了一项 III 期前瞻性、开放标签、随机试验。在中央静脉通路装置插入后,连续入组计划接受癌症化疗的患者,随机分为无抗凝预防、低分子肝素(LMWH;等抗凝剂量)或华法林 1mg/天。治疗在头 3 个月内进行。在第 1 天和第 90 天分别进行多普勒超声和静脉造影,或者在临床疑似血栓形成时提前进行。
共入组 420 例患者,407 例可评估。共发生 42 例导管相关深静脉血栓形成(DVT)(10.3%),无抗凝组 20 例,华法林组 8 例,LMWH 组 14 例。另外还发生了 9 例非相关导管深静脉血栓形成(CDVT)。抗凝显著降低了导管相关 DVT(p=0.035)和非导管相关 DVT(p=0.007)的发生率,华法林与 LMWH 之间无差异。安全性良好(3.4%为归因事件),但随机预防的依从性低于预期。
预防治疗在导管相关和非导管相关 DVT 方面显示出获益,且未增加严重副作用。