• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义意大利认证疝中心的特征:意大利疝和腹壁外科学会工作组关于最佳现有证据的系统评价的共识。

Defining the characteristics of certified hernia centers in Italy: The Italian society of hernia and abdominal wall surgery workgroup consensus on systematic reviews of the best available evidences.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy.

Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):222-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.052. Epub 2018 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.052
PMID:29730074
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The terms "Hernia Center" (HC) and Hernia Surgeon" (HS) have gained more and more popularity in recent years. Nevertheless, there is lack of protocols and methods for certification of their activities and results. The Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery proposes a method for different levels of certification.

METHODS

The national board created a commission, with the task to define principles and structure of an accreditation program. The discussion of each topic was preceded by a Systematic Review, according to PRISMA Guidelines and Methodology. In case of lack or inadequate data from literature, the parameter was fixed trough a Commission discussion.

RESULTS

The Commission defined a certification process including: "FLC - First level Certification": restricted to single surgeon, it is given under request and proof of a formal completion of the learning curve process for the basic procedures and an adequate year volume of operations. "Second level certification": Referral Center for Abdominal Wall Surgery. It is a public or private structure run by at least two already certified and confirmed FLC surgeons. "Third level certification": High Specialization Center for Abdominal Wall Surgery. It is a public or private structure, already confirmed as Referral Centers, run by at least three surgeons (two certified and confirmed with FLC and one research fellow in abdominal wall surgery). Both levels of certification have to meet the Surgical Requirements and facilities criteria fixed by the Commission.

CONCLUSION

The creation of different types of Hernia Centers is directed to create two different entities offering the same surgical quality with separate mission: the Referral Center being more dedicated to clinical and surgical activity and High Specialization Centers being more directed to scientific tasks.

摘要

背景

近年来,“疝中心”(HC)和“疝外科医生”(HS)这两个术语越来越受欢迎。然而,它们的活动和结果的认证缺乏协议和方法。意大利疝和腹壁外科学会提出了一种用于不同认证级别的方法。

方法

国家委员会成立了一个委员会,负责定义认证计划的原则和结构。根据 PRISMA 指南和方法,对每个主题的讨论都进行了系统回顾。在文献中缺乏或数据不足的情况下,通过委员会讨论确定了参数。

结果

委员会定义了一个认证流程,包括:“FLC-第一级认证”:仅限于单个外科医生,应在请求下提供,并证明已完成基本程序的学习曲线过程和足够的年手术量。“第二级认证”:腹壁外科转诊中心。它是由至少两名已经认证和确认的 FLC 外科医生运营的公共或私人结构。“第三级认证”:腹壁外科高级专科中心。它是一个公共或私人结构,已经被确认为转诊中心,由至少三名外科医生(两名认证和确认的 FLC 外科医生和一名腹壁外科研究研究员)运营。这两个级别的认证都必须满足委员会规定的手术要求和设施标准。

结论

创建不同类型的疝中心旨在创建两个提供相同手术质量的不同实体,具有不同的使命:转诊中心更专注于临床和手术活动,而高级专科中心更专注于科学任务。

相似文献

1
Defining the characteristics of certified hernia centers in Italy: The Italian society of hernia and abdominal wall surgery workgroup consensus on systematic reviews of the best available evidences.定义意大利认证疝中心的特征:意大利疝和腹壁外科学会工作组关于最佳现有证据的系统评价的共识。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):222-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.052. Epub 2018 May 4.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
5
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
8
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
9
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
10
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.成人肱骨近端骨折的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the relationship between hospital caseload and outcome in incisional hernia repair?-A registry-based analysis of 55,584 patients.切口疝修补术中医院病例数量与治疗结果之间的关系是什么?——基于登记系统对55584例患者的分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Aug 13;410(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03836-z.
2
Complex abdomen: a scoping review.复杂腹部:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 Feb 10;29(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6.
3
The Impact of a Specialized Hernia Center and Standardized Practices on Surgical Outcomes in Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
专业疝气中心和标准化操作对疝气手术治疗效果的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Jul 22;3:13270. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13270. eCollection 2024.
4
ENGINE-An EHS Project for Future Guidelines.ENGINE——一项面向未来指南的环境、健康与安全项目。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Jul 12;3:13007. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13007. eCollection 2024.
5
Description of the Current Da Vinci Training Pathway for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery by the European Hernia Society.欧洲疝学会对当前机器人腹壁手术达芬奇培训路径的描述。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2022 Nov 30;1:10914. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2022.10914. eCollection 2022.
6
A Systematic Review on the Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Inguinal Hernias.基质金属蛋白酶在腹股沟疝发病机制中的作用的系统评价。
Biomolecules. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):1123. doi: 10.3390/biom13071123.
7
Elective Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair: Value of an Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit.择期复发性腹股沟疝修补术:腹壁外科手术单元的价值。
World J Surg. 2023 Oct;47(10):2425-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07080-8. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
8
Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block is useful in pain relief after laparoscopic stapled repair of diastasis recti and ventral hernia.腹腔镜腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜吻合器修复腹直肌分离和腹疝术后的疼痛缓解中具有作用。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;19(2):207-211. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_111_22.
9
Inguinal hernia in southern Brazil - challenges in follow-up and recurrence rates.巴西南部的腹股沟疝 - 随访和复发率的挑战。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Sep 2;49:e20223238. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223238-en. eCollection 2022.
10
Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair.机器人再 TAPP:一种用于失败的后修补的微创替代方法。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Feb 28;49:e20223063. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063. eCollection 2022.