Jørgensen Kim, Rendtorff Jacob Dahl, Holen Mari
Department of Nursing, University College Copenhagen, Hillerod, Denmark.
Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Dec;32(4):1359-1370. doi: 10.1111/scs.12581. Epub 2018 May 6.
The aim of the study was to explore how patient participation is constructed in social interaction processes between nurses, other health professionals and service users, and which structures provide a framework for the participation of service users in a psychiatric context?
Ten tape-recorded interviews of nurses and observations of interactions between nurses, other health professionals and service users reflected differing constructed views of patient participation. Charmaz's interpretation of the grounded theory method was used, and the data were analysed using constant comparative analysis.
The study was designed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration (1) and Danish law (2). Each study participant in the two psychiatric departments gave informed consent after verbal and written information.
The articulation of patient participation emphasises the challenge between, on the one side, orientations of ethical care, and, on the other, paternalism and biomedicine. The core category was generated from four inter-related categories: (i) taking care of the individual needs; (ii) the service user as expert; and (iii) biomedicine, and (iv) paternalism, and their 13 subcategories.
This study illuminates the meaning of patient participation in a psychiatric context based on social interaction between nurses, other health professionals and service users. This can contribute to dealing with the challenges of incorporating patient participation as an ideology in all service users in a psychiatric context and is therefore important knowledge for health professionals.
本研究旨在探讨在护士、其他医疗专业人员和服务使用者之间的社会互动过程中,患者参与是如何构建的,以及哪些结构为服务使用者在精神科背景下的参与提供了框架?
对护士进行了10次录音访谈,并观察了护士、其他医疗专业人员和服务使用者之间的互动,这些反映了对患者参与的不同构建观点。采用了 Charmaz 对扎根理论方法的解释,并使用持续比较分析对数据进行了分析。
本研究是根据《赫尔辛基宣言》(1)和丹麦法律(2)的伦理原则设计的。两个精神科部门的每位研究参与者在获得口头和书面信息后均给予了知情同意。
患者参与的阐述强调了一方面伦理关怀取向与另一方面家长式作风和生物医学之间的挑战。核心类别由四个相互关联的类别产生:(i)关注个体需求;(ii)服务使用者作为专家;(iii)生物医学;(iv)家长式作风,以及它们的13个子类别。
本研究基于护士、其他医疗专业人员和服务使用者之间的社会互动,阐明了精神科背景下患者参与的意义。这有助于应对在精神科背景下将患者参与作为一种理念纳入所有服务使用者的挑战,因此对医疗专业人员来说是重要的知识。