Suppr超能文献

在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中,对吸入干粉形式和定量气雾剂形式的异丙托溴铵的支气管扩张作用进行的安慰剂对照比较。

A placebo-controlled comparison between the bronchodilatory effects of ipratropium bromide inhaled as a dry powder and by metered dose inhaler in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Gimeno F, van Veenen R, Berg W C, Steenhuis E J

机构信息

Asthma Clinic, Beatrixoord Hospital, Haren (Gr.), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1988 Nov;61(5):341-3.

PMID:2973269
Abstract

A placebo-controlled study was performed to compare the effect of the inhalation of ipratropium bromide as a powder (capsule = 40 micrograms) and by pressurized aerosol (two puffs of 20 micrograms; ie, 40 micrograms). Fifteen patients (nine males and six females) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were studied in a double-blind crossover comparison of the two different modes of administration. The VC, FEV1 and viscous work of breathing time-response curves were almost identical, indicating bronchodilation. We conclude that in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the powder inhalation was not more effective than the pressurized aerosol. It could, however, be offered as an alternative to patients with poor hand-lung coordination. The patients tolerated the two modes of administration without difficulties: no local irritation or coughing was observed.

摘要

进行了一项安慰剂对照研究,以比较吸入溴化异丙托铵粉末(胶囊 = 40 微克)和通过压力气雾剂(两喷,每次 20 微克;即 40 微克)的效果。在一项针对 15 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(9 名男性和 6 名女性)的双盲交叉比较中,研究了这两种不同给药方式。肺活量(VC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和呼吸粘性功的时间反应曲线几乎相同,表明有支气管扩张作用。我们得出结论,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,粉末吸入并不比压力气雾剂更有效。然而,对于手肺协调性差的患者,它可以作为一种替代方法。患者对这两种给药方式耐受良好:未观察到局部刺激或咳嗽。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验