Feng Ji Guang, Ding Lu Bin, Wang Jing Sheng, Yao Ping Ping, Yao Shuai Chen, Wang Zhi Kai
School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 May;27(5):1375-1382. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.015.
The data of valuation of forest ecosystem service function (FESF) in 101 primary case studies of China were collected and obtained based on Specifications for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services in China (LY/T 1721-2008). FESF was then analyzed synthetically in terms of value coefficient. The results showed that the average value per unit area (VPUA) of FESF in China was 6.11×10 yuan·hm, and the order of VPUA of each service function was: water conservation (2.44×10 yuan·hm)> soil conservation (1.15×10 yuan·hm)> biodiversity conservation (1.00×10 yuan·hm)> carbon fixation and oxygen release (0.98×10 yuan·hm)> atmosphere environmental purification (0.28×10 yuan·hm)> forest recreation (0.23×10 yuan·hm)> action of forest against natural calamities (0.19×10 yuan·hm)> nutrient accumulation(0.16×10 yuan·hm). Water conservation, soil conservation, biodiversity conservation, carbon fixation and oxygen release were the four dominant service functions of forest ecosystem in China. The VPUA of FESF of the reserve level was higher than that of county level. The establishment of reserves played positive roles in biodiversity conservation and enhancement of service function, but the service function of forest recreation still existed with some insufficiency, and it needed to be further improved. Dominant service functions of forest ecosystem varied in different physicographic regions, and each type of service function presented different differentiation characteristics in space. The VPUA of FESF in South China was the highest up to 11.36×10 yuan·hm. The power regression correlation coefficients (R) of the total value of FESF with forest area and forest stock volume were 0.905 (P<0.01) and 0.860 (P<0.01), respectively, indicating that forest area and forest stock volume were the two key factors affecting FESF and its total value. Moreover, latitude and mean annual precipitation also had significant effect on the VPUA of FESF.
基于《中国森林生态系统服务功能评估规范》(LY/T 1721—2008),收集并获取了中国101个主要案例研究中的森林生态系统服务功能(FESF)估值数据。然后,从价值系数方面对FESF进行了综合分析。结果表明,中国森林生态系统服务功能的单位面积平均价值(VPUA)为6.11×10元·hm ,各服务功能的VPUA排序为:水源涵养(2.44×10元·hm )>土壤保持(1.15×10元·hm )>生物多样性保护(1.00×10元·hm )>固碳释氧(0.98×10元·hm )>大气环境净化(0.28×10元·hm )>森林游憩(0.23×10元·hm )>森林防灾减灾(0.19×10元·hm )>养分积累(0.16×10元·hm )。水源涵养、土壤保持、生物多样性保护、固碳释氧是中国森林生态系统的四大主导服务功能。保护区级别森林生态系统服务功能的VPUA高于县级。保护区的建立对生物多样性保护和服务功能提升起到了积极作用,但森林游憩服务功能仍存在一定不足,有待进一步改善。森林生态系统的主导服务功能在不同自然地理区域存在差异,各类型服务功能在空间上呈现出不同的分异特征。中国南方森林生态系统服务功能的VPUA最高,达11.36×10元·hm 。森林生态系统服务功能总值与森林面积、森林蓄积量的幂回归相关系数(R)分别为0.905(P<0.01)和0.860(P<0.01),表明森林面积和森林蓄积量是影响森林生态系统服务功能及其总值的两个关键因素。此外,纬度和年平均降水量对森林生态系统服务功能的VPUA也有显著影响。